Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting

被引:21
|
作者
Jordan, Eric J. [1 ]
Fiske, Charles [2 ]
Zagoria, Ronald J. [1 ]
Westphalen, Antonio C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, 505 Parnasssus Ave,M-391, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] RadNet Med Imaging, Walnut Creek, CA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging & Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
Computed tomography; Angiography; Aortic aneurysm; EVAR; Imaging; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; CANCER; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; FUSION; SYSTEM; SCORE;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-017-1169-5
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the utility of PI-RADS v2 to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer (CS-PCa) with magnetic resonance ultrasound (MR/US) fusion-guided prostate biopsies in the non-academic setting. Materials/methods: Retrospective analysis of men whom underwent prostate multiparametric MRI and subsequent MR/US fusion biopsies at a single non-academic center from 11/2014 to 3/2016. Prostate MRIs were performed on a 3-Tesla scanner with a surface body coil. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 scoring algorithm was utilized and MR/US fusion biopsies were performed in selected cases. Mixed effect logistic regression analyses and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed on PI-RADS v2 alone and combined with PSA density (PSAD) to predict CS-PCa. Results: 170 patients underwent prostate MRI with 282 PI-RADS lesions. MR/US fusion diagnosed 71 CS-PCa, 33 Gleason score 3+3, and 168 negative. PI-RADS v2 score is a statistically significant predictor of CS-PCa (P < 0.001). For each one-point increase in the overall PI-RADS v2 score, the odds of having CS-PCa increases by 4.2 (95% CI 2.2-8.3). The area under the ROC curve for PI-RADS v2 is 0.69 (95% CI 0.63-0.76) and for PI-RADS v2 + PSAD is 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.82), statistically higher than PI-RADS v2 alone (P < 0.001). The rate of CS-PCa was about twice higher in men with high PSAD (>= 0.15) compared to men with low PSAD (< 0.15) when a PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion was detected (P = 0.005). Conclusion: PI-RADS v2 is a strong predictor of CS-PCa in the non-academic setting and can be further strengthened when utilized with PSA density.
引用
收藏
页码:2725 / 2731
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the performance of PI-RADS v2 in the non-academic setting
    Eric J. Jordan
    Charles Fiske
    Ronald J. Zagoria
    Antonio C. Westphalen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2017, 42 : 2725 - 2731
  • [2] Head-to-head comparison of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS vl
    Polanec, Stephan
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Bickel, Hubert
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Georg, Dietmar
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Aulitzky, Wolfgang
    Susani, Martin
    Baltzer, Pascal A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (06) : 1125 - 1131
  • [3] Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS v2, Proposed Adjusted PI-RADS v2 and Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: A Preliminary Study
    Cai, Guan-Hui
    Yang, Qi-Hua
    Chen, Wen-Bo
    Liu, Qing-Yu
    Zeng, Yu-Rong
    Zeng, Yu-Jing
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 1823 - 1834
  • [4] Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of PI-RADS V1 and PI-RADS V2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    He, Ying
    Cong, Ruochen
    Zhou, Jie
    Xu, Zhenyu
    Yang, Jushun
    Wang, Lin
    Xiao, Jing
    He, Bosheng
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (01) : 51 - 57
  • [5] Evaluation of prostate volume in mpMRI: comparison of the recommendations of PI-RADS v2 and PI-RADS v2.1
    Gundogdu, Elif
    Emekli, Emre
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 27 (01) : 15 - 19
  • [6] Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Kasel-Seibert, Moritz
    Lehmann, Thomas
    Aschenbach, Rene
    Guettler, Felix V.
    Abubrig, Mohamed
    Grimm, Marc-Oliver
    Teichgraeber, Ulf
    Franiel, Tobias
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (04) : 726 - 731
  • [7] PI-RADS v2: Current standing and future outlook
    Smith, Clayton P.
    Turkbey, Baris
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 44 (03): : 189 - 194
  • [8] PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Eric J. Jordan
    Charles Fiske
    Ronald Zagoria
    Antonio C. Westphalen
    Abdominal Radiology, 2018, 43 : 3109 - 3116
  • [9] Impact of PI-RADS v2 on indication of prostate biopsy
    Rozas, George de Queiroz
    Saad, Lucas Scatigno
    de Farias e Melo, Homero Jose
    Azevedo Gabrielle, Henrique Armando
    Szejnfeld, Jacob
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2019, 45 (03): : 486 - 494
  • [10] PI-RADS v2 and ADC values: is there room for improvement?
    Jordan, Eric J.
    Fiske, Charles
    Zagoria, Ronald
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 43 (11) : 3109 - 3116