Look Who's Talking! A Roadside Survey of Drivers' Cell Phone Use

被引:50
|
作者
Young, Kristie L. [1 ]
Rudin-Brown, Christina M. [1 ]
Lenne, Michael G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Cell phones; Observational survey; Driver distraction; Driver characteristics; MOBILE TELEPHONE USE; CONVERSATIONS; CRASHES;
D O I
10.1080/15389588.2010.499442
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to quantify Melbourne drivers' rates of handheld and hands-free phone use and the driver, vehicle, site, and time characteristics associated with phone use. Additionally, this study sought to examine any change in the prevalence of handheld cell phone use by Melbourne drivers between 2006 and 2009. Method: Observational survey of vehicle drivers at various times of the day and week at 3 sites across metropolitan Melbourne during May 2009. Results: A total of 195 (3.4%) of the 5813 drivers observed were using handheld phones and 81 (1.4%) were using hands-free phones. This represents a significant increase in handheld phone usage rates compared to those found in an earlier study conducted in Melbourne in 2006. Cell phone use was associated with a range of driver, vehicle, site, and time characteristics. Handheld phone users were predominately young or middle-aged drivers who drove cars or 4-wheel-drive vehicles (4WDs), and this activity was more likely to occur in the late afternoon. Use of hands-free phones did not differ significantly across gender, age group, vehicle type, observation site, or time of day; however, use of hands-free phones was higher on weekdays compared to weekends. Conclusions: Despite legislation being in place, drivers' handheld cell phone use is still a major road safety concern, particularly for young and middle-aged drivers. The effectiveness of other strategies for decreasing handheld usage rates, including increased surveillance and tougher penalties, need to be ascertained.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 560
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Look who's talking: The interdisciplinarity of bioethics and the implications for bioethics education
    Iltis, Ana S.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICINE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2006, 31 (06): : 629 - 641
  • [42] LOOK WHO'S TALKING: DETECTING THE DOMINANT SPEAKER IN A CLUTTERED SCENARIO
    D'Arca, Eleonora
    Robertson, Neil M.
    Hopgood, James R.
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2014,
  • [43] Look Who's Talking - Little Hans: Reading Rymkiewicz with Freud
    Matuszek, Dawid
    TEKSTY DRUGIE, 2015, (02): : 215 - 233
  • [44] Look who's talking - Which sex has the gift of the gab?
    Muir, Hazel
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2007, 196 (2635-6) : 60 - 61
  • [45] Look Who's Talking: Measuring Self-Disclosure in MFT
    Steven M. Harris
    Charette A. Dersch
    Mona Mittal
    Contemporary Family Therapy, 1999, 21 : 405 - 415
  • [46] Look who's talking: Measuring self-disclosure in MFT
    Harris, SM
    Dersch, CA
    Mittal, M
    CONTEMPORARY FAMILY THERAPY, 1999, 21 (03) : 405 - 415
  • [47] LOOK WHO'S TALKING: THE SNITCHING PARADOX IN A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE OF PRISONERS
    Pyrooz, David C.
    Mitchell, Meghan M.
    Moule, Richard K.
    Decker, Scott H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CRIMINOLOGY, 2021, 61 (04): : 1145 - 1167
  • [48] Look who's talking: recognizing friends from visible articulation
    Rosenblum, Lawrence D.
    Niehus, Ryan P.
    Smith, Nicolas M.
    PERCEPTION, 2007, 36 (01) : 157 - 159
  • [49] Look who's talking - How animals communicate: a special report
    不详
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2000, 166 (2233) : 28 - 29