Look Who's Talking! A Roadside Survey of Drivers' Cell Phone Use

被引:50
|
作者
Young, Kristie L. [1 ]
Rudin-Brown, Christina M. [1 ]
Lenne, Michael G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Accid Res Ctr, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Cell phones; Observational survey; Driver distraction; Driver characteristics; MOBILE TELEPHONE USE; CONVERSATIONS; CRASHES;
D O I
10.1080/15389588.2010.499442
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to quantify Melbourne drivers' rates of handheld and hands-free phone use and the driver, vehicle, site, and time characteristics associated with phone use. Additionally, this study sought to examine any change in the prevalence of handheld cell phone use by Melbourne drivers between 2006 and 2009. Method: Observational survey of vehicle drivers at various times of the day and week at 3 sites across metropolitan Melbourne during May 2009. Results: A total of 195 (3.4%) of the 5813 drivers observed were using handheld phones and 81 (1.4%) were using hands-free phones. This represents a significant increase in handheld phone usage rates compared to those found in an earlier study conducted in Melbourne in 2006. Cell phone use was associated with a range of driver, vehicle, site, and time characteristics. Handheld phone users were predominately young or middle-aged drivers who drove cars or 4-wheel-drive vehicles (4WDs), and this activity was more likely to occur in the late afternoon. Use of hands-free phones did not differ significantly across gender, age group, vehicle type, observation site, or time of day; however, use of hands-free phones was higher on weekdays compared to weekends. Conclusions: Despite legislation being in place, drivers' handheld cell phone use is still a major road safety concern, particularly for young and middle-aged drivers. The effectiveness of other strategies for decreasing handheld usage rates, including increased surveillance and tougher penalties, need to be ascertained.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 560
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Signal transduction by oxidants: Look who's talking
    Mossman, BT
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (09) : 1315 - 1316
  • [22] Look Who's Talking FGFs and BMPs in the Proepicardium
    Svensson, Eric C.
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2009, 105 (05) : 406 - 407
  • [23] LOOK WHO'S TALKING Use of sources in newspaper coverage in Sweden and the United States
    Dimitrova, Daniela V.
    Stromback, Jesper
    JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2009, 3 (01) : 75 - 91
  • [24] A Roadside Survey of Alcohol and Drug Use Among Drivers in British Columbia
    Beirness, Douglas J.
    Beasley, Erin E.
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2010, 11 (03) : 215 - 221
  • [25] Prevalence of psychoactive drug use among drivers in Thailand: A roadside survey
    Ingsathit, Atiporn
    Woratanarat, Patarawan
    Anukarahanonta, Tongtavuch
    Rattanasiri, Sasivimol
    Chatchaipun, Porntip
    Wattayakorn, Kanokporn
    Lim, Stephen
    Suriyawongpaisal, Paibul
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2009, 41 (03): : 474 - 478
  • [26] Look Who's Talking: Active Speaker Detection in the Wild
    Kim, You Jin
    Heo, Hee-Soo
    Choe, Soyeon
    Chung, Soo-Whan
    Kwon, Yoohwan
    Lee, Bong-Jin
    Kwon, Youngki
    Chung, Joon Son
    INTERSPEECH 2021, 2021, : 3675 - 3679
  • [27] Look Who's Talking! Islamic Discourse in the Chechen Wars
    Radnitz, Scott
    NATIONALITIES PAPERS-THE JOURNAL OF NATIONALISM AND ETHNICITY, 2006, 34 (02): : 237 - 256
  • [28] Look Who's Talking: Conscience, Complicity, and Compelled Speech
    Hill, B. Jessie
    INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 2022, 97 (03) : 914 - 938
  • [29] Look who's talking - Authenticating service access points
    Hohl, A
    Lowis, L
    Zugenmaier, A
    SECURITY IN PERVASIVE COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3450 : 151 - 162
  • [30] Editorial: Look who's talking: Dialogues with beta cells
    Tellez, Noelia
    Rojas, Anabel
    Gasa, Rosa
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 13