Independent verification of treatment planning system calculations

被引:1
|
作者
Dabrowska-Szewczyk, Edyta [1 ,2 ]
Zawadzka, Anna [1 ]
Brzozowska, Beata [2 ]
Walewska, Agnieszka [1 ]
Kukolowicz, Pawel [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr & Inst Oncol, Dept Med Phys, WK Roentgena 5 Str, PL-02781 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Fac Phys, Biomed Phys Div, Pasteura 5 Str, PL-02093 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
3D-conformal radiotherapy; Treatment planning system; Quality control; Validation of dose calculation; Pre-treatment verification; ENERGY;
D O I
10.2478/nuka-2021-0006
中图分类号
O61 [无机化学];
学科分类号
070301 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Purpose: According to the available international recommendations, at least one independent verification of the calculations of number of monitor unit (MU) is required for every patient treated by teleradiotherapy. The aim of this study was to estimate the differences of dose distributions calculated with two treatment planning systems: Eclipse (Varian) and Oncentra MasterPlan (Elekta). Materials and methods: The analysis was performed for 280 three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy treatment (3D-CRT) plans with photon beams from Varian accelerators: CL 600C/D X6 MV (109 plans), CL 2300C/D X6 MV (43 plans), and CL 2300C/D X15 MV (128 plans). The mean doses in the planning target volume (PTV) and doses at the isocenter point obtained with Eclipse and Oncentra MasterPlan (OMP) were compared with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. Additionally, the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations were compared with dosimetric measurements performed in the inhomogeneous phantom. Results: Data were analysed for 6 MV plans and for 15 MV plans separately, independently of the treatment machine. The dose values calculated in Eclipse were significantly (p <0.001) higher compared to calculations of OMP system. The average difference of the mean dose to PTV was (1.4 +/- 1.0)% for X6 MV and (2.5 +/- 0.6)% for X15 MV. Average dose disparities at the isocenter point were (1.3 +/- 1.9)% and (2.1 +/- 1.0)% for X6 MV and X15 MV beams, respectively. The largest differences were observed in lungs, air cavities, and bone structures. Moreover the variation in dosimetric measurements was less as compared to Eclipse calculations. Conclusions: OMP calculations were introduced as the independent MU verification tool with the first action level range equal to 3.5%.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Independent verification of treatment planning system calculations
    Dabrowska, E.
    Brzozowska, B.
    Walewska, A.
    Kukolowicz, P.
    Zawadzka, A.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 : S1004 - S1005
  • [2] Independent verification for XiO treatment planning system
    Oliveira, A
    Germano, S
    Pereira, P
    Batel, V
    Marques, F
    Almeida, P
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S195 - S196
  • [3] Verification of calculations carried out with the Eclipse treatment planning system
    Ahmad, Habib
    Ahmad, Misbah
    Ali, Shahid
    Khattak, M. Rauf
    Shaheen, Wajeeha
    Gilani, Jawad A.
    Ahmad, Khalil
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 24 (03): : 109 - 114
  • [4] An independent verification of dosimetry for the Leksell Gamma Knife® treatment planning system
    Weldon, M.
    Gupta, N.
    Kanellitsas, C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (06) : 2416 - 2417
  • [5] Dosimetric verification of treatment planning system superficial dose calculations for proton beam
    Rah, Jeong-Eun
    Shin, Dongho
    Park, Jeong-hoon
    Hwang, Ui-Jung
    Oh, Do Hoon
    Park, Sung Yong
    [J]. RADIATION MEASUREMENTS, 2013, 55 : 60 - 63
  • [6] Treatment planning system verification
    Doppke, K
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (06) : 1355 - 1355
  • [7] Verification of monitor unit calculations for a 3D treatment planning system in clinical practice
    Sanford, R
    Al-Ghazi, M
    Orlowski, E
    Dunia, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1205 - 1205
  • [8] Dosimetric Verification of HDR Treatment Planning System Dose Calculations by Farmer Chamber Measurements in Water
    Corrao, A.
    Cardarelli, G.
    Mihaylov, I.
    Curran, B.
    Sternick, E.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3199 - +
  • [9] Comparison of monitor units calculated by radiotherapy treatment planning system and an independent monitor unit verification software
    Sellakumar, P.
    Arun, C.
    Sanjay, S. S.
    Ramesh, S. B.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA, 2011, 27 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [10] An empirical model for independent dose verification of the Gamma Knife treatment planning
    Phaisangittisakul, N
    Ma, LJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (09) : 1991 - 1997