Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate Evaluation of soft and hard tissues using the Alt-RAMEC protocol

被引:1
|
作者
Dogan, Ege [1 ]
Seckin, Ozlem [2 ]
机构
[1] Private Clin, Dept Orthodont, Ali Cetinkaya Bulvari Servet Apartmani 14,Kat 1, Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Izmir, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF OROFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS-FORTSCHRITTE DER KIEFERORTHOPADIE | 2020年 / 81卷 / 03期
关键词
Facial growth; Rapid maxillary expansion; Maxilla; Angle class III malocclusion; Orofacial cleft; CLASS-III MALOCCLUSION; REPETITIVE WEEKLY PROTOCOL; EXPANSIONS; CONSTRICTION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1007/s00056-020-00220-y
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the hard and soft tissue effects and differences of the Alt-RAMEC protocol to the facemask and conventional facemask protocols in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Methods This prospective study was carried out with 30 patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate with skeletal and dental class III malocclusions who were referred to a university department of orthodontics. The patients were evaluated with the cervical vertebral maturation method and divided into two groups, each consisting of 15 patients. The patients in group I (mean age 10.00 & x202f;+/- 0.73 years) were treated according to conventional facemask protocol, and the patients in group II (mean age 10.07 & x202f;+/- 2.43 years) were treated according to the Alt-RAMEC protocol before facemask application. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were evaluated by using the Dolphin Imaging Software version 11.7. The skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue differences and treatment times were evaluated. Results Group II demonstrated a 5.73 degrees increase in SNA, which was statistically significant, while this increase was 3.13 degrees in group I (p & x202f;< 0.001). Results for Co-A and A-PTV showed a significant increase for group II only (group I: 1.02 & x202f;mm, 1.06 & x202f;mm, group II: 3.02 & x202f;mm, 2.21 & x202f;mm; p & x202f;< 0.05 and p & x202f;< 0.01, respectively). In addition, group II presented significant increase for the values of ANB, N-A-Pg, SN/MP, Wits, U1-SN, U1-L1, U1-PTV, U1-FHP, U6-PTV, U6-FHP, overjet, Ss-PTV, UL-PTV and UL-S line (p & x202f;< 0.001). The treatment mean times were 7.3 months in group I and 4.7 months in group II (p & x202f;< 0.01). Conclusion Applying the facemask after having followed the Alt-RAMEC protocol induced more skeletal, dentoalveolar and soft tissue changes in comparison to the conventional facemask protocol in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 219
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] MAXILLARY PROTRACTION - DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON FACIAL MORPHOLOGY IN UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL CLEFT-LIP AND PALATE PATIENTS
    TINDLUND, RS
    RYGH, P
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 1993, 30 (02): : 208 - 221
  • [22] Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients
    Ahn, Hyo-Won
    Kim, Keun-Woo
    Yang, Il-Hyung
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (05) : 935 - 941
  • [23] Preoperative Cleft Lip Measurements and Maxillary Growth in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate
    Antonarakis, Gregory S.
    Tompson, Bryan D.
    Fisher, David M.
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (06): : E198 - E207
  • [24] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with cleft lip and palate Response
    Gomes, Oscar Stangherlin
    Carvalho, Roberta Martinelli
    Faco, Renato
    Yatabe, Marilia
    Ozawa, Terumi Okada
    De Clerck, Hugo
    Timmerman, Hilde
    Garib, Daniela
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2021, 159 (03) : E193 - E193
  • [25] Cephalometric Outcomes of Maxillary Expansion and Protraction in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate After Two Types of Palatoplasty
    Tome, Wakako
    Yashiro, Kohtaro
    Kogo, Mikihiko
    Yamashiro, Takashi
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2016, 53 (06): : 690 - 694
  • [26] Maxillary expansion and protraction in correction of midface retrusion in a complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patient
    Kawakami, M
    Yagi, T
    Takada, K
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2002, 72 (04) : 355 - 361
  • [27] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion
    Ren, Yijin
    Steegman, Ralph
    Dieters, Arjan
    Jansma, Johan
    Stamatakis, Harry
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (05) : 2429 - 2441
  • [28] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate and Class III malocclusion
    Yijin Ren
    Ralph Steegman
    Arjan Dieters
    Johan Jansma
    Harry Stamatakis
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2019, 23 : 2429 - 2441
  • [29] Maxillary sinus volumes of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Erdur, Omer
    Ucar, Faruk Izzet
    Sekerci, Ahmet Ercan
    Celikoglu, Mevlut
    Buyuk, Suleyman Kutalmis
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2015, 79 (10) : 1741 - 1744
  • [30] Maxillary expansion using transpalatal distraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Scolozzi, Paolo
    Verdeja, Raul
    Herzog, Georges
    Jaques, Bertrand
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2007, 119 (07) : 2200 - 2205