Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients

被引:35
|
作者
Ahn, Hyo-Won
Kim, Keun-Woo
Yang, Il-Hyung [1 ]
Choi, Jin-Young [2 ]
Baek, Seung-Hak [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Seoul 110768, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seoul 110768, South Korea
关键词
Cleft type; Maxillary hypoplasia; Facemask; Miniplate anchorage; CLASS-III MALOCCLUSION; EARLY CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; MASK THERAPY; CEPHALOMETRIC EVALUATION; EXPANSION; GROWTH; CHILDREN; SKELETAL; AGE; PALATOPLASTY;
D O I
10.2319/010112-1.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the difference in the effects of facemask with miniplate (FM-MP) anchorage on maxillary protraction in growing cleft patients between unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) groups. Materials and Methods: The samples consisted of a UCLP group (N = 15, 13 boys and 2 girls; mean age 10.98 years; mean protraction duration 2.37 years) and a BCLP group (N = 15, all boys; mean age 11.42 years; mean protraction duration 2.36 years), who were treated with the same surgical technique (rotation and advancement flap and double opposing Z-plasty) by one surgeon and with FM-MP by one orthodontist. Lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and after FM-MP (T2). Fourteen skeletal and dental variables were measured. Independent and paired t-tests were performed for statistical analysis. Results: There were no differences in mean age and values of variables at the T1 stage and in the duration of protraction between the two groups. The BCLP group showed less advancement of point A than the UCLP group (Delta A-vertical reference plane, 2.51 mm vs 4.06 mm, P < .05; Delta A-N perpendicular, 0.79 mm vs 2.26 mm, P < .05; ASNA, 0.45 degrees vs 2.85 degrees, P < .01). Since counterclockwise rotation of the palatal plane in two groups was minimal (-0.36 degrees vs -0.87 degrees), no difference was observed with regard to clockwise rotation of the mandible (0.46 degrees vs -0.07 degrees). There were no differences in the degree of labioversion of the maxillary incisor (8.16 degrees vs -7.10 degrees), linguoversion of the mandibular incisor (-2.66 degrees vs -2.14 degrees), and increase in overjet (5.39 mm vs 5.70 mm) between the two groups. Conclusion: In FM-MP therapy of growing cleft patients under the conditions of this study, the UCLP group shows a more favorable change in maxillary advancement than the BCLP group. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:935-941.)
引用
收藏
页码:935 / 941
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Long-Term Use of Facemask With Miniplate on Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
    On, Sung Woon
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    Choi, Jin-Young
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 29 (02) : 309 - 314
  • [2] Effects of maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Iwasaki, H
    Ishikawa, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (05) : 1244 - 1244
  • [3] New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    Kim, Keun-Woo
    Choi, Jin-Young
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2010, 80 (04) : 783 - 791
  • [4] MAXILLARY PROTRACTION - DIFFERENT EFFECTS ON FACIAL MORPHOLOGY IN UNILATERAL AND BILATERAL CLEFT-LIP AND PALATE PATIENTS
    TINDLUND, RS
    RYGH, P
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 1993, 30 (02): : 208 - 221
  • [5] Late Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Study
    Borzabadi-Farahani, Ali
    Lane, Christianne J.
    Yen, Stephen L. -K.
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 51 (01): : E1 - E10
  • [6] Asymmetric Maxillary Protraction for Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate Patients Using Finite Element Analysis
    Chen, Zhengxi
    Pan, Xiaogang
    Zhao, Ning
    Chen, Zhenqi
    Shen, Gang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 26 (02) : 388 - 392
  • [7] Facemask Therapy in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients
    Kumar, Saurav
    Verma, Gaurav
    Hassan, Nadira
    Anjan, Ravi
    Khan, Rehan Ahmad
    Shaikh, Sana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 13 (06): : S1303 - S1305
  • [8] Effects of maxillary protraction combined with chin-cap therapy in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients
    Ishikawa, H
    Kitazawa, S
    Iwasaki, H
    Nakamura, S
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (01): : 92 - 97
  • [9] Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: Is maxillary expansion mandatory?
    Elabbassy, Eman H.
    Sabet, Noha E.
    Hassan, Islam T.
    Elghoul, Dina H.
    Elkassaby, Marwa A.
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2020, 90 (04) : 539 - 547
  • [10] Efficacy of Rapid Maxillary Expansion Associated With Maxillary Protraction in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate
    Terumi Ozawa, Okada
    Daniela Salzedas, Costa
    Beatriz Oliveira, De Lima
    Sathler, Renata
    Baessa, Gleisieli
    Garib, Daniela
    [J]. CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (07): : 872 - 876