Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients

被引:33
|
作者
Ahn, Hyo-Won
Kim, Keun-Woo
Yang, Il-Hyung [1 ]
Choi, Jin-Young [2 ]
Baek, Seung-Hak [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont, Seoul 110768, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dent Res Inst, Sch Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Seoul 110768, South Korea
关键词
Cleft type; Maxillary hypoplasia; Facemask; Miniplate anchorage; CLASS-III MALOCCLUSION; EARLY CRANIOFACIAL MORPHOLOGY; MASK THERAPY; CEPHALOMETRIC EVALUATION; EXPANSION; GROWTH; CHILDREN; SKELETAL; AGE; PALATOPLASTY;
D O I
10.2319/010112-1.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the difference in the effects of facemask with miniplate (FM-MP) anchorage on maxillary protraction in growing cleft patients between unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) groups. Materials and Methods: The samples consisted of a UCLP group (N = 15, 13 boys and 2 girls; mean age 10.98 years; mean protraction duration 2.37 years) and a BCLP group (N = 15, all boys; mean age 11.42 years; mean protraction duration 2.36 years), who were treated with the same surgical technique (rotation and advancement flap and double opposing Z-plasty) by one surgeon and with FM-MP by one orthodontist. Lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and after FM-MP (T2). Fourteen skeletal and dental variables were measured. Independent and paired t-tests were performed for statistical analysis. Results: There were no differences in mean age and values of variables at the T1 stage and in the duration of protraction between the two groups. The BCLP group showed less advancement of point A than the UCLP group (Delta A-vertical reference plane, 2.51 mm vs 4.06 mm, P < .05; Delta A-N perpendicular, 0.79 mm vs 2.26 mm, P < .05; ASNA, 0.45 degrees vs 2.85 degrees, P < .01). Since counterclockwise rotation of the palatal plane in two groups was minimal (-0.36 degrees vs -0.87 degrees), no difference was observed with regard to clockwise rotation of the mandible (0.46 degrees vs -0.07 degrees). There were no differences in the degree of labioversion of the maxillary incisor (8.16 degrees vs -7.10 degrees), linguoversion of the mandibular incisor (-2.66 degrees vs -2.14 degrees), and increase in overjet (5.39 mm vs 5.70 mm) between the two groups. Conclusion: In FM-MP therapy of growing cleft patients under the conditions of this study, the UCLP group shows a more favorable change in maxillary advancement than the BCLP group. (Angle Orthod. 2012;82:935-941.)
引用
下载
收藏
页码:935 / 941
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Long-term stability of maxillary protraction therapy in Class III patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Zhang, Yixin
    Fu, Zhen
    Jia, Haichao
    Huang, Yiping
    Li, Xiaobei
    Liu, Hao
    Li, Weiran
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2019, 89 (02) : 214 - 220
  • [32] Dental development in children with cleft lip and palate: a comparison between unilateral and bilateral clefts
    Hazza'a, A. M.
    Rawashdeh, M. A.
    Al-Jamal, G.
    Al-Nimri, K. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2009, 10 (02) : 90 - 94
  • [33] Evaluation of Facial Soft Tissue in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate Corrected Using Maxillary Protraction Appliances
    Uehara, Sayuri
    Honda, Aya
    Kawase-Koga, Yoko
    Chikazu, Daichi
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (04) : 1480 - 1482
  • [34] Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients with skeletal anchorage.
    Aizenbud, Dror
    Rachmiel, Adi
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (02): : 221 - 223
  • [35] Effects of Palate Repair on Cranial Base and Maxillary Morphology in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate
    Liu, Xiyang
    Chen, Zhenqi
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (10): : 1367 - 1374
  • [36] Maxillary Sinus Volume in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate by CBCT
    Yassaei, Soghra
    Ezodini, Fatemeh
    Shiri, Armin
    Nasr, Nazanin
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 34 (07) : E641 - E644
  • [37] Miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction in adolescent patients with cleft lip and palate: A literature review of study design, type and protocol, and treatment outcomes
    Ahn, Hyo-Won
    Kim, Su-Jung
    Baek, Seung-Hak
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 : 21 - 30
  • [38] Initial cleft severity and maxillary growth in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate
    Chiu, Yu-Ting
    Liao, Yu-Fang
    Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2011, 140 (02) : 189 - 195
  • [39] Three dimensional assessment of protraction in craniofacial structures of cleft lip and palate model using Facemask and Maxgym
    Parveen, Shahistha
    Husain, Akhter
    Shenoy, Satish
    Mascarenhas, Rohan
    Reddy, Srinivas Gosla
    Reddy, Mallikarjuna
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 19 (02) : 553 - 561