Understanding Group Polarization with Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks

被引：1
|
作者：
Proietti, Carlo [1 ]
机构：
[1] Lund Univ, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
来源：
COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT | 2016年 / 287卷
关键词：
Group Polarization; Persuasive Arguments Theory; Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks; Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks; BELIEF POLARIZATION; ACCEPTABILITY; SHIFTS;
D O I：
10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-41
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
Group polarization occurs when an initial attitude or belief of individuals becomes more radical after group discussion. Polarization often leads subgroups towards opposite directions. Since the 1960s this effect has been observed and repeatedly confirmed in lab experiments by social psychologists. Persuasive Arguments Theory (PAT) emerged as the most convincing explanation for this phenomenon. This paper is a first attempt to frame the PAT explanation more formally by means of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks (BAFs). In particular, I show that polarization may emerge in a BAF by simple and rational belief updates by participants.
引用
收藏
页码：41 / 52
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Audiences in argumentation frameworks
    Bench-Capon, Trevor J. M.
    Doutre, Sylvie
    Dunne, Paul E.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2007, 171 (01) : 42 - 71
  • [22] Compact Argumentation Frameworks
    Baumann, Ringo
    Dvorak, Wolfgang
    Linsbichler, Thomas
    Strass, Hannes
    Woltran, Stefan
    21ST EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2014), 2014, 263 : 69 - +
  • [23] Polarization and persuasive argumentation: A study of decision making in group settings
    El-Shinnawy, M
    Vinze, AS
    MIS QUARTERLY, 1998, 22 (02) : 165 - 198
  • [24] Uniform Argumentation Frameworks
    Atkinson, Katie
    Bench-Capon, Trevor
    Dunne, Paul E.
    Computational Models of Argument, 2012, 245 : 165 - 176
  • [25] On the Aggregation of Argumentation Frameworks
    Delobelle, Jerome
    Konieczny, Sebastien
    Vesic, Srdjan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI), 2015, : 2911 - 2917
  • [26] Symmetric argumentation frameworks
    Coste-Marquis, S
    Devred, C
    Marquis, P
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3571 : 317 - 328
  • [27] Ordering Argumentation Frameworks
    Sakama, Chiaki
    Inoue, Katsumi
    SYMBOLIC AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES TO REASONING WITH UNCERTAINTY, ECSQARU 2019, 2019, 11726 : 87 - 98
  • [28] Merging Argumentation Frameworks
    Leite, Lucas
    Alves, Thiago
    Alcantara, Joao
    2015 BRAZILIAN CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (BRACIS 2015), 2015, : 110 - 115
  • [29] Value Based Argumentation in Hierarchical Argumentation Frameworks
    Modgil, S.
    COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT, 2006, 144 : 297 - 308
  • [30] Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities
    Nouioua, Farid
    Risch, Vincent
    SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT, 2011, 6929 : 163 - 176
12345