Characterization of three solid state dosimetry systems for use in high energy photon dosimetry audits in radiotherapy

被引:47
|
作者
Wesolowska, Paulina Elzbieta [1 ]
Cole, Andrew [1 ]
Santos, Tania [1 ]
Bokulic, Tomislav [1 ]
Kazantsev, Pavel [1 ]
Izewska, Joanna [1 ]
机构
[1] IAEA, Sect Dosimetry & Med Radiat Phys, Vienna, Austria
关键词
TLD; OSLD; RPLD; Quality audits in radiotherapy; OPTICALLY STIMULATED LUMINESCENCE; TLD; OSL; BEAMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.04.017
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The IAEA Dosimetry Laboratory (DOL) aims to improve the accuracy of clinical dosimetry in hospitals world-wide by providing independent remote audits for high energy photon beams. A thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) system has been used by the DOL to provide audit services for over 47 years. Two additional systems: an optically stimulated luminescent dosimetry (OSLD) system and a radiophoto luminescent dosimetry (RPLD) system underwent a commissioning process. The systems' parameters, reading methodology and the dosimetric characteristics were investigated and compared. The read-out procedure for each system was established and optimized. Dosimetric characteristics such as reproducibility, signal fading with time after irradiation, signal per dose dependence and energy response were investigated. Additional tests to check signal depletion per readout and individual sensitivities of dosimeters were performed for RPLDs and OSLDs and also reading position dependence for the RPLD system was checked. The reproducibility of 4 readings of one dosimeter is 0.48% for TLDs, 0.16% for OSLDs and 0.15% for RPLDs. The fading effect after 100 days was 4% for TLD, 2% for OSLD and 0.4% for RPLD. Energy response of TLDs and RPLDs is comparable, higher corrections were found for OSLDs. The RPLD dose-response is sub linear whereas TLD and OSLD response is supra-linear at the dose range under study (1-4 Gy). The TLD reading procedure is destructive but OSLDs and RPLDs can be read repeatedly and the signal depletion per reading is 0.036% for OSLDs and 0.017% for RPLDs. The sensitivity correction factors for RPLDs and OSLDs were determined with the standard deviation in response of 1000 dosimeters of 2.2% for OSLD and 0.9% for RPLD. The combined standard uncertainties (k=1) are 1.60% for TLDs, 1.46% for OSLDs and 1.51% for RPLDs. All three systems can be successfully used for auditing purposes if corrections for all described effects are applied. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 562
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Small field dosimetry using three solid state dosimeters for advanced dose audit in radiotherapy
    Mizuno, H. M.
    Grochowska, P. G.
    Azangwe, G. A.
    Deneva, B. D.
    Lechner, W. L.
    Izewska, J. I.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S271 - S271
  • [12] Fabrication and characterization of silicon detectors for use in radiotherapy dosimetry, pre-irradiated by high-energy electrons
    Thungstrom, Goran
    Mattsson, C. G.
    Ronnqvist, Camilla
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 2007, 576 (01): : 209 - 214
  • [13] Characterization of OSLDs for Use in Small Field Photon Beam Dosimetry
    Pham, C.
    Alvarez, P.
    Kry, S.
    Luo, D.
    Stingo, F.
    Followill, D.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [15] Response corrections for solid-state detectors in megavoltage photon dosimetry
    Yin, Z
    Hugtenburg, RP
    Beddoe, AH
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (16): : 3691 - 3702
  • [16] Energy dependence of radiochromic dosimetry films for use in radiotherapy verification
    Chelminski, Krzysztof
    Bulski, Wojciech
    Georg, Dietmar
    Bodzak, Dominika
    Maniakowski, Zbigniew
    Oborska, Dominika
    Rostkowska, Joanna
    Kania, Malgorzata
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2010, 15 (02) : 40 - 46
  • [17] Improving the neutron-to-photon discrimination capability of detectors used for neutron dosimetry in high energy photon beam radiotherapy
    Irazola, L.
    Terron, J. A.
    Bedogni, R.
    Pola, A.
    Lorenzoli, M.
    Sanchez-Nieto, B.
    Gomez, F.
    Sanchez-Doblado, F.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2016, 115 : 49 - 54
  • [18] Dosimetry of high energy photon and electron beams with CEA films
    Cheng, CW
    Das, IJ
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 23 (07) : 1225 - 1232
  • [19] DOSIMETRY AND QUALITY SPECIFICATION OF HIGH-ENERGY PHOTON BEAMS
    BRAHME, A
    ANDREO, P
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA ONCOLOGY, 1986, 25 (03): : 213 - 223
  • [20] White polystyrene as a substitute for water in high energy photon dosimetry
    Christ, G
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (12) : 2097 - 2100