Effects of Target Size and Test Distance on Stereoacuity

被引:5
|
作者
Iwata, Yo [1 ]
Fujimura, Fusako [2 ]
Handa, Tomoya [2 ]
Shoji, Nobuyuki [2 ,3 ]
Ishikawa, Hitoshi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kitasato Univ, Grad Sch, Doctors Program Med Sci, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[2] Kitasato Univ, Sch Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Orthopt & Visual Sci Course, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
[3] Kitasato Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 2520373, Japan
关键词
STEREOSCOPIC ACUITY; STEREOPSIS; IMPROVEMENT; STEREOTEST; MONOVISION; SURGERY; FRISBY; TNO;
D O I
10.1155/2016/7950690
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Target size and test distance effects on stereoacuity were investigated in 24 subjects using a three-dimensional monitor. Examination 1: Target Size Effects. The test distance was 2.5 m for 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values for 0.1 degrees, 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes were 59.58 +/- 14.86, 47.66 +/- 13.71, 41.25 +/- 15.95, and 39.41 +/- 15.52 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity was significantly worse with a 0.1 degrees target than with 0.2 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 0.9 degrees target sizes (P = 0.03, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.0001, resp.). Examination 2: Test Distance Effects. Test distances of 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 m were investigated for a 0.5 degrees target size; crossed parallax was presented in 22-second units. Average stereoacuity values at 2.5 m, 5.0 m, and 7.5 m test distances were 44.91 +/- 16.16, 34.83 +/- 10.84, and 24.75 +/- 7.27 seconds, respectively. Stereoacuity at a 7.5 m distance was significantly better than at distances of 2.5 m and 5.0 m (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.02, resp.). Stereoacuity at a 5.0 m distance was significantly better than at 2.5 m (P = 0.04). Stereoacuity should be estimated by both parallax and other elements, including test distance and target size.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A variable distance stereoacuity test.
    Kaye, SB
    Siddiqui, A
    Ward, A
    Noonan, C
    Fisher, T
    Brown, M
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1997, 38 (04) : 535 - 535
  • [2] Assessment of a new distance randot stereoacuity test
    Fu, Valeria L. N.
    Birch, Eileen E.
    Holmes, Jonathan M.
    JOURNAL OF AAPOS, 2006, 10 (05): : 419 - 423
  • [3] Contribution of a Real Depth Distance Stereoacuity Test to Clinical Management
    Young, B. J.
    Sueke, H.
    Wylie, J. M.
    Kaye, S. B.
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 2009
  • [5] Impact of Target Distance, Target Size, and Visual Acuity on the Video Head Impulse Test
    Judge, Paul D.
    Rodriguez, Amanda I.
    Barin, Kamran
    Janky, Kristen L.
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 159 (04) : 739 - 742
  • [6] Stereoacuity at distance and near
    Wong, BPH
    Woods, RL
    Peli, E
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2002, 79 (12) : 771 - 778
  • [7] Validity and repeatability of contour-based visotec distance stereoacuity test
    Magar, Jit B. Ale
    Shah, Shaheen P.
    Sleep, Michael G.
    Willett, Faren A.
    Dai, Shuan H.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2023, 106 (03) : 283 - 289
  • [8] PUPIL SIZE AND STEREOACUITY
    LURIA, SM
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1976, 66 (02) : 157 - 159
  • [9] Distance stereoacuity in intermittent exotropia
    Hatt, S. R.
    Haggerty, H.
    Buck, D.
    Adams, W.
    Strong, N. P.
    Clarke, M. P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 91 (02) : 219 - 221
  • [10] The effects of pressure on target distance and size perception during a throwing task
    Ogasa, Kisho
    Nakamoto, Hiroki
    Mori, Shiro
    JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 38 : S92 - S92