Cardinal and Rank Ordering of Criteria - Addressing Prescription within Weight Elicitation

被引:12
|
作者
Larsson, Aron [1 ,2 ]
Riabacke, Mona [1 ]
Danielson, Mats [1 ]
Ekenberg, Love [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, Forum 100, SE-16440 Kista, Sweden
[2] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Informat Technol & Media, SE-85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis; elicitation method; criteria weights; criteria ranking; incomplete information; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; PARTIAL INFORMATION; STATEMENTS; SUPPORT; QUALITY; SMARTER;
D O I
10.1142/S021962201450059X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Weight elicitation methods in multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are often cognitively demanding, require too much precision, time and effort. Some of the issues may be remedied by connecting elicitation methods to an inference engine facilitating a quick and easy method for decision-makers to use weaker input statements, yet being able to utilize these statements in a method for decision evaluation. In this paper, we propose a fast and practically useful weight elicitation method, answering to many of the requirements. The method builds on the ideas of rank-order methods, but can also take imprecise cardinal information into account. The method is subsequently employed in two real-life case studies and compared to a case where a simple ratio weight procedure using exact input statements was employed.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1330
页数:32
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] EMPLOYING CARDINAL RANK ORDERING OF CRITERIA IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS
    Riabacke, Mona
    Danielson, Mats
    Larsson, Aron
    Ekenberg, Love
    UNCERTAINTY MODELING IN KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2012, 7 : 76 - 82
  • [2] Criteria for the rank ordering of fMRI Independent Components
    Esposito, F
    Formisano, E
    Cirillo, S
    Elefante, R
    Tedeschi, G
    Goebel, R
    Di Salle, F
    NEUROIMAGE, 2001, 13 (06) : S114 - S114
  • [4] On ordering of multicriterial objects based on rank criteria
    Gvozdik, A.A.
    Soviet journal of computer and systems sciences, 1992, 30 (05): : 60 - 69
  • [5] Weighting Under Ambiguous Preferences and Imprecise Differences in a Cardinal Rank Ordering Process
    Danielson, Mats
    Ekenberg, Love
    Larsson, Aron
    Riabacke, Mona
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS, 2014, 7 : 105 - 112
  • [6] Weighting Under Ambiguous Preferences and Imprecise Differences in a Cardinal Rank Ordering Process
    Mats Danielson
    Love Ekenberg
    Aron Larsson
    Mona Riabacke
    International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2014, 7 : 105 - 112
  • [8] USE OF CRITERIA WEIGHTS IN RANK ORDERING TECHNIQUES OF PROJECT EVALUATION
    NOWLAN, DM
    URBAN STUDIES, 1975, 12 (02) : 169 - 176
  • [9] Logistic Regression for Criteria Weight Elicitation in PROMETHEE-Based Ranking Methods
    Balugani, Elia
    Lolli, Francesco
    Butturi, Maria Angela
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    Sellitto, Miguel Afonso
    INTELLIGENT HUMAN SYSTEMS INTEGRATION 2020, 2020, 1131 : 474 - 479
  • [10] Visualising multi-criteria weight elicitation by multiple stakeholders in complex decision systems
    Pierre L. Kunsch
    Jean-Pierre Brans
    Operational Research, 2019, 19 : 955 - 971