Cardinal and Rank Ordering of Criteria - Addressing Prescription within Weight Elicitation

被引:12
|
作者
Larsson, Aron [1 ,2 ]
Riabacke, Mona [1 ]
Danielson, Mats [1 ]
Ekenberg, Love [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockholm Univ, Dept Comp & Syst Sci, Forum 100, SE-16440 Kista, Sweden
[2] Mid Sweden Univ, Dept Informat Technol & Media, SE-85170 Sundsvall, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis; elicitation method; criteria weights; criteria ranking; incomplete information; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; PARTIAL INFORMATION; STATEMENTS; SUPPORT; QUALITY; SMARTER;
D O I
10.1142/S021962201450059X
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Weight elicitation methods in multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) are often cognitively demanding, require too much precision, time and effort. Some of the issues may be remedied by connecting elicitation methods to an inference engine facilitating a quick and easy method for decision-makers to use weaker input statements, yet being able to utilize these statements in a method for decision evaluation. In this paper, we propose a fast and practically useful weight elicitation method, answering to many of the requirements. The method builds on the ideas of rank-order methods, but can also take imprecise cardinal information into account. The method is subsequently employed in two real-life case studies and compared to a case where a simple ratio weight procedure using exact input statements was employed.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1330
页数:32
相关论文
共 31 条