Validation of the MyWellness Key in walking and running speeds

被引:0
|
作者
Bergamin, Marco [1 ]
Ermolao, Andrea [1 ]
Sieverdes, John C. [2 ]
Zaccaria, Marco
Zanuso, Silvano [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Sports Med Div, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Fac Med, Padua, Italy
[2] Univ S Carolina, Dept Exercise Sci, Arnold Sch Publ Hlth, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[3] Univ Greenwich, Dept Sports Sci, Ctr Sport Sci & Human Performance, London SE18 6PF, England
关键词
Accelerometry; Indirect Calorimetry; Measurement; Physical Activity; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; ENERGY-EXPENDITURE; COMPUTER-SCIENCE; CALTRAC ACCELEROMETER; ACTIVITY MONITORS; VALIDITY; RELIABILITY; CALIBRATION; PREDICT; COST;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
This study was performed to assess the validity of the MyWellness Key (MWK) accelerometer during a treadmill-based protocol. The identification of different exercise intensities is imperative to objectively measure time spent at a specified exercise intensity. Thirty subjects, 15 men and 15 women (age = 24.5 +/- 2.6 years; body mass index = 22.5 +/- 2.5 kg.m(-1)), participated in a 4-phase treadmill protocol (5 minutes each one) using three different walking velocities (3, 4.5, and 6 km.h(-1)) and run (8 km.h(-1)) while outfitted with a MWK uniaxial accelerometer. Oxygen consumption was measured by indirect calorimetry (ICVO2). Results: The relationship between VO2 predicted from MWK (MWKVO2) and oxygen consumption (VO2 (ICVO2)), yielded a high and significant correlation (r = 0.944; p < 0.001) with standard error of estimate (SEE) = 2.42 mL.kg(-1).min(-1). The average differences between the two methods (MWKVO2 - ICVO2) were -0.79 (-8.8% at 3 km.h(-1)), -0.02 (-0.2% at 4.5 km.h(-1)), 0.51 (3.3% at 6 km.h(-1)) and -0.74 (-2.7% at 8 km.h(-1)) ml.kg(-1).min(-1). Only the 3 km.h(-1) speed showed a difference when compared to the criterion measure (p < 0.001). Bland and Altman analysis revealed less than a 1 MET difference in the mean at each point estimate and relatively tight distribution with the standard errors, especially with the 2 moderate walking speeds. Conclusions: We found a high correlation between oxygen utilization and the MWK with low standard errors estimates. This indicates that this accelerometer can be used to identify exercise intensities that are related to walking and running.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:57 / 63
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Walking and running
    Duffill, Christine
    NEW SCIENTIST, 2014, 224 (2998) : 33 - 33
  • [22] CHILDREN'S OMNI SCALE OF PERCEIVED EXERTION: WALKING/RUNNING VALIDATION
    Utter, A. C.
    Robertson, R. J.
    Nieman, D. C.
    Kang, J.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2001, 33 (05): : S279 - S279
  • [23] Validation of the adult OMNI scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise
    Utter, AC
    Robertson, RJ
    Green, JM
    Suminski, RR
    McAnulty, SR
    Nieman, DC
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2004, 36 (10): : 1776 - 1780
  • [24] Changes in Key Biomechanical Parameters According to the Expertise Level in Runners at Different Running Speeds
    Fadillioglu, Cagla
    Mohler, Felix
    Reuter, Marcel
    Stein, Thorsten
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2022, 9 (11):
  • [25] Investigation of normal knees kinematics in walking and running at different speeds using a portable motion analysis system
    Liu, Rixu
    Qian, Dongyang
    Chen, Yushu
    Zou, Jianyu
    Zheng, Shicong
    Bai, Bo
    Lin, Zefeng
    Zhang, Yu
    Chen, Yi
    SPORTS BIOMECHANICS, 2024, 23 (04) : 417 - 430
  • [26] Running in the wild: Energetics explain ecological running speeds
    Selinger, Jessica C.
    Hicks, Jennifer L.
    Jackson, Rachel W.
    Wall-Scheffler, Cara M.
    Chang, Derek
    Delp, Scott L.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (10) : 2309 - +
  • [27] Are bats walking or running?
    不详
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2006, 209 (09): : I - I
  • [29] HUMAN WALKING AND RUNNING
    ALEXANDER, RM
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 1984, 18 (02) : 135 - 140
  • [30] THE BIOMECHANICS OF WALKING AND RUNNING
    OUNPUU, S
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 1994, 13 (04) : 843 - 863