THE REFORM IN EDUCATION AND THE NEW DOCTORAL PROGRAMS

被引:0
|
作者
Jashari, Hasan [1 ]
机构
[1] South East European Univ, Tetovo, Macedonia
关键词
Reform; Doctoral Programs; Scientific Research; Macedonia; Ethics of Research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In recent years there have been many hot debates in Macedonia in terms of systemic changes in the area of higher education. We can say that the Government has increased the standards for professors and research activities in general with the adoption of new law amendments concerning higher education regulations. The question is whether the government is more interested for changes rather than universities? But, the strengthening of normative standards does not necceseraly mean that the transition from a more conventional to a more modern approach in PhD studies would also mean a complete implementation of the Salzburg Principles. Third-study education issues in Macedonia are still under constructions and need some changes regarding ethical standards in research and plagiarism policies. We can't say that it's completely reformed yet. Macedonia has implemented a part of what the three-year system and the EUA (European University Association) imply even with the old mentor system of PhD studies. The new PhD candidates have to present their research progress presentations regarding their PhD thesis, take part in scientific conferences, publish their work in journals etc. In this way independent work, transparency and performance would improve. The new system -the Doctoral School -which started in the academic year 2012-2013 is based upon scientific research, independent work, transparency, student and staff mobility, projects, etc. This will be a step forward towards the European model of knowledge and experience. In the Macedonian case the question is whether these innovations will improve the quality of education within these structured programs and doctoral schools. The new Bologna-based approach not only represents a challenge but also a path with many struggles. This is another qualitative challenge for scientific researchers and especially for the new PhD candidates.
引用
收藏
页码:971 / 978
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE PATHWAYS FOR TURKEY
    Ubuz, Behiye
    Cakiroglu, Erdinc
    Erbas, Ayhan Kursat
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEVENTH CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION (CERME 7), 2011, : 1521 - 1530
  • [32] A survey of current practices in data management education in nursing doctoral programs
    Raszewski, Rebecca
    Goben, Abigail H.
    Bergren, Martha Dewey
    Jones, Krista
    Ryan, Catherine
    Steffen, Alana D.
    Vonderheid, Susan C.
    JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2021, 37 (01) : 155 - 162
  • [33] Where Are the Special Niches in Doctoral Programs in Mathematics Education in the United States?
    Reys, Robert E.
    Reys, Barbara J.
    Shih, Jeffrey C.
    JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, 2021, 52 (03) : 349 - 359
  • [34] Doctoral Students' Perspectives on their Doctoral Programs and Departments
    Boyce, B. Ann
    Napper-Owen, Gloria
    Lund, Jackie L.
    Almarode, Danielle
    QUEST, 2019, 71 (03) : 299 - 310
  • [35] DOCTORAL PROGRAMS - COMPOSITION
    LLOYDJONES, R
    FUTURE OF DOCTORAL STUDIES IN ENGLISH, 1989, : 15 - 20
  • [36] DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN DESIGN
    MERIAM, JL
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 1968, 59 (01) : 55 - &
  • [37] Grading doctoral programs
    不详
    IIE SOLUTIONS, 2001, 33 (12): : 12 - 12
  • [38] JUDGING DOCTORAL PROGRAMS
    Drahl, Carmen
    CHEMICAL & ENGINEERING NEWS, 2009, 87 (29) : 18 - 18
  • [39] DOCTORAL CHEMICAL EDUCATION - NEEDED NEW DIMENSION
    不详
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION, 1971, 48 (03) : 147 - &
  • [40] DOCTORAL PROGRAMS IN ACCOUNTING
    ANTHONY, RN
    DUNN, CL
    NELSON, CL
    SALMONSON, RF
    WHEELER, J
    STONE, WE
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 1965, 40 (02): : 414 - 421