A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional measurements of wear in a laboratory investigation

被引:30
|
作者
Rodriguez, Jose M. [1 ]
Bartlett, David W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Dent, Restorat Grp, London SE1 9RT, England
关键词
Erosion; Abrasion; Two-dimensional; Three-dimensional; Surface matching; Profilometers; IN-VITRO; TOOTHBRUSH ABRASION; SURFACE-ROUGHNESS; ERODED ENAMEL; SITU;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2010.07.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of this research was to compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) tooth measuring techniques after subjecting enamel samples to tooth wear in vitro on an erosionabrasion model. Method. 80 polished mid-coronal enamel sections were subjected to 10 wear cycles. Each cycle consisted of remineralization for 2h in artificial saliva, followed by 10min immersion in one of four acidic fruit drinks or distilled water and finally toothbrush abrasion with a non-fluoridated tooth paste. The resulting wear scars were measured using 2D and 3D techniques using surface matching software. Results. The 2D step heights measurements from the exposure to the four acidic drinks showed no statistically significant differences (median wear range=22.432.5 mu m) between them (p=0.99) but there were differences with distilled water (median wear=10.0 mu m) (p=0.01). The 3D measurements showed that two drinks produced more wear compared to the others and water when the whole surface and volume exposed to wear was accounted for (p=0.01). Significance. The difference in data from the two techniques showed that 3D measurements gave a more accurate assessment of the impact of the wear regime.
引用
收藏
页码:E221 / E225
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-Dimensional Forces for Two-Dimensional Motion
    Verkhovsky, Alexander B.
    [J]. BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 108 (04) : 781 - 782
  • [32] Licata: Two-dimensional and three-dimensional art
    Cristiani, MLT
    [J]. CRITICA D ARTE, 2002, 65 (16): : 19 - 20
  • [33] Two-Dimensional Modeling of Three-Dimensional Waves
    D. Chalikov
    [J]. Oceanology, 2021, 61 : 850 - 860
  • [34] Numerical Investigation of Discrepancies Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Acoustic Metamaterials
    Jin, Wenchao
    Guo, Hui
    Sun, Pei
    Wang, Yansong
    Yuan, Tao
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2021, 8
  • [35] Experimental investigation of a two-dimensional and a three-dimensional scramjet inlet at Mach 7
    Haeberle, J.
    Guelhan, A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROPULSION AND POWER, 2008, 24 (05) : 1023 - 1034
  • [36] Direct comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional laser-induced fluorescence measurements on highly turbulent flames
    Ma, Lin
    Lei, Qingchun
    Capil, Tyler
    Hammack, Stephen D.
    Carter, Campbell D.
    [J]. OPTICS LETTERS, 2017, 42 (02) : 267 - 270
  • [37] Comparison between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Assessments of the Fetal Corpus Callosum: Reproducibility of Measurements and Acquisition Time
    Pomar, Leo
    Baert, Jonathan
    Mchirgui, Ali
    Lambert, Veronique
    Carles, Gabriel
    Hcini, Najeh
    Baud, David
    Vial, Yvan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2021, 19 (05) : 312 - 320
  • [38] Three-dimensional ultrasonography of normal fetal heart: Comparison with two-dimensional imaging
    Levental, M
    Pretorius, DH
    Sklansky, MS
    Budorick, NE
    Nelson, TR
    Lou, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 1998, 17 (06) : 341 - 348
  • [39] Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographs Using Clinically Relevant Parameters
    Schmidt, Julia C.
    Gutekunst, Claudia-Julie
    Dagassan-Berndt, Dorothea
    Schmidlin, Patrick R.
    Walter, Clemens
    [J]. DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (02)
  • [40] A Comparison of a Two-Dimensional and a Three-Dimensional Method for Inclusion Determinations in Tool Steel
    Doostmohammadi, H.
    Karasev, A.
    Jonsson, P. G.
    [J]. STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 81 (05) : 398 - 406