A comparison between three-dimensional and two-dimensional grain boundary plane analysis

被引:49
|
作者
Randle, V [1 ]
Davies, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Swansea, Dept Mat Engn, Swansea SA2 8PP, W Glam, Wales
关键词
grain boundary plane; electron backscatter diffraction; Sigma; 3; CSLs; annealing twins;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3991(01)00137-1
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
An EBSD-based methodology for assessment of grain boundary planes, in particular Sigma3 boundaries in face-centred cubic materials, has recently been devised. The method is based on trace analysis in a single, two-dimensional section rather than the more arduous three-dimensional method. The paper reports a data set of grain boundary planes in alpha-brass, mainly Sigma3s, which have been analysed using both methods so that they can be compared and a recommendation made about the usefulness of the new method. It is shown that the new, two-dimensional method is a valuable tool in the analysis of grain boundary geometry, especially when used in conjunction with nu/nu(m) a parameter for assessing the proximity to the misorientation reference structure. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 162
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices
    Dolocan, A
    Dolocan, VO
    Dolocan, V
    MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2004, 18 (25): : 1301 - 1309
  • [3] Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall
    Kaufmann, K.
    Gardner, A. D.
    Costes, M.
    NEW RESULTS IN NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL FLUID MECHANICS X, 2016, 132 : 315 - 325
  • [4] A Comparison Between the Accuracy of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Strain Measurements
    Desai, Niranjan
    Poling, Joel
    Fischer, Gregor
    Georgakis, Christos
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, DIAGNOSTICS AND PROGNOSTICS OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2018, 1 (02):
  • [5] Field of View Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Endoscopy
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Tabor, Mark H.
    Youssef, A. Samy
    Lau, Tsz
    Carlson, Andrew P.
    van Loveren, Harry R.
    Agazzi, Siviero
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (02): : 387 - 390
  • [6] Computer simulations of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ideal grain growth
    Kim, Seong Gyoon
    Kim, Dong Ik
    Kim, Won Tae
    Park, Yong Bum
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2006, 74 (06):
  • [7] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems
    McDougall, EM
    Soble, JJ
    Wolf, JS
    Nakada, SY
    Elashry, OM
    Clayman, RV
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 371 - 374
  • [8] A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion
    Gross, MM
    Trotman, CA
    Moffatt, KS
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1996, 66 (03) : 189 - 194
  • [9] Three-Dimensional Analysis in Facial Asymmetry: Comparison With Model Analysis and Conventional Two-Dimensional Analysis
    Moro, Alessandro
    Correra, Pasquale
    Boniello, Roberto
    Gasparini, Giulio
    Pelo, Sandro
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (02) : 417 - 422
  • [10] The comparison between the results of the two-dimensional and three-dimensional Models of Vehicle Bridge Interaction
    Kortis, Jan
    Daniel, Lubos
    XXIV R-S-P SEMINAR, THEORETICAL FOUNDATION OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (24RSP) (TFOCE 2015), 2015, 111 : 425 - 430