Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall

被引:2
|
作者
Kaufmann, K. [1 ]
Gardner, A. D. [1 ]
Costes, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] German Aerosp Ctr DLR, Inst Aerodynam & Flow Technol, Bunsenstr 10, D-37073 Gottingen, Germany
[2] ONERA French Aerosp Lab, DAAP Dept Appl Aerodynam, 8 Rue Vertugadins, F-92190 Meudon, France
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-319-27279-5_28
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
Numerical computations using the DLR-TAU code investigate the differences and similarities between dynamic stall on the two-dimensional OA209 airfoil and the three-dimensional OA209 finite wing. The mean angle of attack in the two-dimensional computations is reduced to match the effective angle of attack at the spanwise position where in the finite wing computations the dynamic stall vortex starts to evolve. Small variations of the mean angle of attack in the two-dimensional numerical simulations show a change from trailing edge separation only to deep dynamic stall. The analysis of the three-dimensional flow field reveals that after the evolution of the dynamic stall vortex the flow field is split into two parts: 1. High spanwise velocities towards the wing's root in the region between the plane of the first occurrence of stall and the wing's root. 2. High spanwise velocities towards the wing's tip in the region between the plane of the first occurrence of stall and wing tip.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 325
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison between the two-dimensional and three-dimensional lattices
    Dolocan, A
    Dolocan, VO
    Dolocan, V
    [J]. MODERN PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2004, 18 (25): : 1301 - 1309
  • [2] A Comparison Between the Accuracy of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Strain Measurements
    Desai, Niranjan
    Poling, Joel
    Fischer, Gregor
    Georgakis, Christos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, DIAGNOSTICS AND PROGNOSTICS OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2018, 1 (02):
  • [3] Field of View Comparison Between Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Endoscopy
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    Tabor, Mark H.
    Youssef, A. Samy
    Lau, Tsz
    Carlson, Andrew P.
    van Loveren, Harry R.
    Agazzi, Siviero
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2014, 124 (02): : 387 - 390
  • [4] Modeling three-dimensional dynamic stall
    Chao Lü
    Tong-guang Wang
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2011, 32 : 393 - 400
  • [5] Modeling three-dimensional dynamic stall
    Lue, Chao
    Wang, Tong-guang
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND MECHANICS-ENGLISH EDITION, 2011, 32 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [6] Modeling three-dimensional dynamic stall
    吕超
    王同光
    [J]. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics(English Edition), 2011, 32 (04) : 393 - 400
  • [7] A comparison between three-dimensional and two-dimensional grain boundary plane analysis
    Randle, V
    Davies, H
    [J]. ULTRAMICROSCOPY, 2002, 90 (2-3) : 153 - 162
  • [8] Measurement of Three-Dimensional Stall Cells on a Two-Dimensional NACA0015 Airfoil
    Dell'Orso, Haley
    Tuna, Burak A.
    Amitay, Michael
    [J]. AIAA JOURNAL, 2016, 54 (12) : 3872 - 3883
  • [9] Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems
    McDougall, EM
    Soble, JJ
    Wolf, JS
    Nakada, SY
    Elashry, OM
    Clayman, RV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1996, 10 (04) : 371 - 374
  • [10] A comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional analyses of facial motion
    Gross, MM
    Trotman, CA
    Moffatt, KS
    [J]. ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 1996, 66 (03) : 189 - 194