A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems

被引:11
|
作者
Monnin, P [1 ]
Gutierrez, D
Bulling, S
Lepori, D
Valley, JF
Verdun, FR
机构
[1] Inst Univ Radiophys Appl, IRA, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] CHU Vaudois, Dept Radiol, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 50卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/11/012
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work compares the detector performance and image quality of the new Kodak Min-R EV mammography screen-film system with the Fuji CR Profect detector and with other current mammography screen-film systems from Agfa, Fuji and Kodak. Basic image quality parameters (MTF, NPS, NEQ and DQE) were evaluated for a 28 kV Mo/Mo (HVL = 0.646 turn Al) beam using different mAs exposure settings. Compared with other screen-film systems, the new Kodak Min-R EV detector has the highest contrast and a low intrinsic noise level, giving better NEQ and DQE results, especially at high optical density. Thus, the properties of the new mammography film approach those of a fine mammography detector, especially at low frequency range. Screen-film systems provide the best resolution. The presampling MTF of the digital detector has a value of 15% at the Nyquist frequency and, due to the spread size of the laser beam, the use of a smaller pixel size would not permit a significant improvement of the detector resolution. The dual collection reading technology increases significantly the low frequency DQE of the Fuji CR system that can at present compete with the most efficient mammography screen-film systems.
引用
收藏
页码:2617 / 2631
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    Hermann, KP
    Obenauer, S
    Funke, M
    Grabbe, EH
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (09) : 2188 - 2191
  • [32] Digital versus screen-film mammography:: A retrospective comparison in a population-based screening program
    Heddson, Boel
    Ronnow, Katarina
    Olsson, Magnus
    Miller, David
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2007, 64 (03) : 419 - 425
  • [33] Screen-film versus full-field digital mammography:: Comparison in breast cancer screening
    Sigfússon, BF
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (07) : 663 - 663
  • [34] Sensitometric analyses of screen-film systems for mammography exams in Brazil
    Magalhaes, L. A. G.
    Drexler, G. G.
    de Almeida, C. E.
    Medeiros, L. L.
    Ferreira, N. M. P. D.
    Estrada, J. J. S.
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2015, 117 : 64 - 69
  • [35] Screen-film and digital mammography - Image quality and radiation dose considerations
    Haus, AG
    Yaffe, MJ
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (04) : 871 - +
  • [36] Digital and screen-film diagnostic mammography: A time-motion study
    Farria, DM
    Monsees, BS
    Hildebolt, CF
    Stoutenburg, C
    Graham, K
    Wiele, KN
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 268 - 269
  • [37] Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography
    Ishiyama, Mitsutomi
    Tsunoda-Shimizu, Hiroko
    Kikuchi, Mari
    Saida, Yukihisa
    Hiramatsu, Sonoe
    BREAST CANCER, 2009, 16 (01) : 58 - 61
  • [38] Contrast-detail detectability analysis: Comparison of a digital spot mammography system and an analog screen-film mammography system
    Liu, H
    Fajardo, LL
    Barrett, JR
    Baxter, RA
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 1997, 4 (03) : 197 - 203
  • [39] Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer SenoScan digital mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography population
    Cole, E
    Pisano, ED
    Brown, M
    Kuzmiak, C
    Braeuning, MP
    Kim, HH
    Jong, R
    Walsh, R
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) : 879 - 886
  • [40] Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography
    Mitsutomi Ishiyama
    Hiroko Tsunoda-Shimizu
    Mari Kikuchi
    Yukihisa Saida
    Sonoe Hiramatsu
    Breast Cancer, 2009, 16 : 58 - 61