A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems

被引:11
|
作者
Monnin, P [1 ]
Gutierrez, D
Bulling, S
Lepori, D
Valley, JF
Verdun, FR
机构
[1] Inst Univ Radiophys Appl, IRA, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] CHU Vaudois, Dept Radiol, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 50卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/11/012
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work compares the detector performance and image quality of the new Kodak Min-R EV mammography screen-film system with the Fuji CR Profect detector and with other current mammography screen-film systems from Agfa, Fuji and Kodak. Basic image quality parameters (MTF, NPS, NEQ and DQE) were evaluated for a 28 kV Mo/Mo (HVL = 0.646 turn Al) beam using different mAs exposure settings. Compared with other screen-film systems, the new Kodak Min-R EV detector has the highest contrast and a low intrinsic noise level, giving better NEQ and DQE results, especially at high optical density. Thus, the properties of the new mammography film approach those of a fine mammography detector, especially at low frequency range. Screen-film systems provide the best resolution. The presampling MTF of the digital detector has a value of 15% at the Nyquist frequency and, due to the spread size of the laser beam, the use of a smaller pixel size would not permit a significant improvement of the detector resolution. The dual collection reading technology increases significantly the low frequency DQE of the Fuji CR system that can at present compete with the most efficient mammography screen-film systems.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:2617 / 2631
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screen-film mammography and soft-copy full-field digital mammography: Comparison in the patients with microcalcifications
    Kim, HS
    Han, BK
    Choo, KS
    Jeon, YH
    Kim, JH
    Choe, YH
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 6 (04) : 214 - 220
  • [22] TECHNOLOGIC IMPROVEMENTS IN SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY
    HAUS, AG
    RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (03) : 628 - 637
  • [23] RECENT ADVANCES IN SCREEN-FILM MAMMOGRAPHY
    HAUS, AG
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1987, 25 (05) : 913 - 928
  • [24] Comparison of Digital Screening Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography in the Early Detection of Clinically Relevant Cancers: A Multicenter Study
    Bluekens, Adriana M. J.
    Holland, Roland
    Karssemeijer, Nico
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    den Heeten, Gerard J.
    RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) : 707 - 714
  • [25] Breast mass classification on full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography
    Shi, Jiazheng
    Sahiner, Berkman
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Ge, Jun
    Wei, Jun
    DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5116 : 371 - 377
  • [26] Optimizing techniques in screen-film mammography
    Hendrick, RE
    Berns, EA
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2000, 38 (04) : 701 - +
  • [27] Sensitometric analyses of screen-film systems for mammography exams in Brazil
    Medeiros, L. L.
    Magalhaes, L. A. G.
    Estrada, J. J. S.
    Ferreira, N. M. P. D.
    de Almeida, C. E.
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2015, 51 : 15 - 17
  • [28] An intensifying screen-film combination for mammography
    Alfimov, M.V.
    Gurvich, A.M.
    Rozhkova, N.I.
    Sidorov, Yu.D.
    Novikov, G.F.
    Tombak, M.I.
    Li, N.I.
    Grishin, M.P.
    Golovkova, S.I.
    Leonova, N.I.
    Bikmatov, R.R.
    Shevchenko, V.N.
    Meditsinskaya Tekhnika, 1992, (06):
  • [29] Digital Mammography Is Similar to Screen-Film Mammography for Women with Personal History of Breast Cancer
    Moy, Linda
    Gao, Yiming
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 300 (02) : 301 - 302
  • [30] Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications
    K.-P. Hermann
    S. Obenauer
    M. Funke
    E. Grabbe
    European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 2188 - 2191