A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems

被引:11
|
作者
Monnin, P [1 ]
Gutierrez, D
Bulling, S
Lepori, D
Valley, JF
Verdun, FR
机构
[1] Inst Univ Radiophys Appl, IRA, CH-1007 Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] CHU Vaudois, Dept Radiol, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 50卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/11/012
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work compares the detector performance and image quality of the new Kodak Min-R EV mammography screen-film system with the Fuji CR Profect detector and with other current mammography screen-film systems from Agfa, Fuji and Kodak. Basic image quality parameters (MTF, NPS, NEQ and DQE) were evaluated for a 28 kV Mo/Mo (HVL = 0.646 turn Al) beam using different mAs exposure settings. Compared with other screen-film systems, the new Kodak Min-R EV detector has the highest contrast and a low intrinsic noise level, giving better NEQ and DQE results, especially at high optical density. Thus, the properties of the new mammography film approach those of a fine mammography detector, especially at low frequency range. Screen-film systems provide the best resolution. The presampling MTF of the digital detector has a value of 15% at the Nyquist frequency and, due to the spread size of the laser beam, the use of a smaller pixel size would not permit a significant improvement of the detector resolution. The dual collection reading technology increases significantly the low frequency DQE of the Fuji CR system that can at present compete with the most efficient mammography screen-film systems.
引用
收藏
页码:2617 / 2631
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 283 - 283
  • [2] A comparison of clinical findings in digital and screen-film mammography
    Piccoli, CW
    Maidment, AD
    Cavanaugh, BC
    Parker, L
    Albert, M
    Cupp, SL
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 417 - 417
  • [3] Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Cutter, GR
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (05) : 830 - 834
  • [4] A COMPARISON OF MAMMOGRAPHY SCREEN-FILM COMBINATIONS
    SCHUELER, BA
    GRAY, JE
    GISVOLD, JJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1992, 184 (03) : 629 - 634
  • [5] A comparison of the performance of new screen-film and digital mammography systems - art. no. 61423B
    Monnin, P.
    Gutierrez, D.
    Castella, C.
    Lepori, D.
    Verdun, F. R.
    [J]. Medical Imaging 2006: Physics of Medical Imaging, Pts 1-3, 2006, 6142 : B1423 - B1423
  • [6] A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms
    Undrill, PE
    O'Kane, AD
    Gilbert, FJ
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 55 (10) : 782 - 790
  • [7] Digital and screen-film mammography: Comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times
    Berns, EA
    Hendrick, RE
    Solari, M
    Barke, L
    Reddy, D
    Wolfman, J
    Segal, L
    DeLeon, P
    Benjamin, S
    Willis, L
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (01) : 38 - 41
  • [8] Full-field digital mammography in comparison to screen-film mammography - A phantom study
    Obenauer, S
    Schorn, C
    Funke, M
    Fischer, U
    Grabbe, E
    Hermann, KP
    [J]. IWDM 2000: 5TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY, 2001, : 499 - 503
  • [9] Comparison of full-field digital and screen-film mammography dose
    Schueler, B.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2005 - 2005
  • [10] Quality Imaging -: Comparison of CR Mammography with Screen-Film Mammography
    Gaona, E.
    Nieto, J. Azorin
    Gongora, J. A. Iran Diaz
    Arreola, M.
    Castellanoso, G. Casian
    Castaneda, G. M. Perdigon
    Enriquez, J. G. Franco
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 854 : 227 - +