SMART CITY: Definition and hvaluation of Key Performance Indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Picioroaga, Irina-Ioana [1 ]
Eremia, Mircea [1 ]
Sanduleac, Mihai [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politehn Bucuresti, Dept Elect Power Syst, Bucharest, Romania
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process; energy and environment indicators; evaluation model; Smart City; sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Accelerated evolution of technology and rising level of globalization have encouraged the emergence of a new concept of urban communities. Smart City model can efficiently incorporate the most recent scientific solutions in daily activities of cities, and improve living quality by integrating social resources, infrastructure modernization and economic growth. Although this novel concept is gaining more and more attention, a smart city assessment system is rarely applied in order to evaluate urban development situation, leading to unjustified decision making and unnecessary investments. In this regard, the formulation of a relevant set of key indicators is mandatory for measuring performance of cities development. The goal of the paper is to provide a comprehensive evaluation model fi- this system of indicators, focusing on energy and environment concerns as study subjects. With the assistance of computer programs, the z-transformation and Analytic Hierarchy Process methods are implemented for the evaluation algorithm construction. The presented model seeks to investigate the development profiles of various cities around the world, but also to carry out comparisons between performances of the selected cities.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 222
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Reasoning with Key Performance Indicators
    Barone, Daniele
    Jiang, Lei
    Amyot, Daniel
    Mylopoulos, John
    PRACTICE OF ENTERPRISE MODELING, 2011, 92 : 82 - +
  • [42] Beyond key performance indicators
    Morgulev, Elia
    Lebed, Felix
    GERMAN JOURNAL OF EXERCISE AND SPORT RESEARCH, 2024, 54 (03) : 335 - 340
  • [43] Generic Key Performance Indicators
    Kallab, Chadi
    Ghawi, Marc
    2014 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-TECHNOLOGIES AND NETWORKS FOR DEVELOPMENT (ICEND), 2014, : 165 - 171
  • [44] Benchmarking key performance indicators
    Longman, P.A.
    World Cement, 1999, 30 (05):
  • [45] Key performance indicators for facility performance assessment: simulation of core indicators
    Lavy, Sarel
    Garcia, John A.
    Scinto, Phil
    Dixit, Manish K.
    CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (12) : 1183 - 1204
  • [46] Key performance indicators for measuring contractors' performance
    Ling, Florence Yean Yng
    Peh, Shanny
    Architectural Science Review, 2005, 48 (04) : 357 - 365
  • [47] Key performance indicators improve industrial performance
    Lindberg, Carl-Fredrik
    Tan, SieTing
    Yan, JinYue
    Starfelt, Fredrik
    CLEAN, EFFICIENT AND AFFORDABLE ENERGY FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE, 2015, 75 : 1785 - 1790
  • [48] Smart Microgrid Monitoring: Evaluation of Key Performance Indicators for a PV Plant Connected to a LV Microgrid
    Bracco, Stefano
    Delfino, Federico
    Foiadelli, Federica
    Longo, Michela
    2017 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES CONFERENCE EUROPE (ISGT-EUROPE), 2017,
  • [49] Machine Learning Estimation of Battery Efficiency and Related Key Performance Indicators in Smart Energy Systems
    Luque, Joaquin
    Tepe, Benedikt
    Larios, Diego
    Leon, Carlos
    Hesse, Holger
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (14)
  • [50] Defining Key Performance Indicators for Evaluating the Use of High Definition Video-to-Video Services in eHealth
    Molnar, Andreea
    Weerakkody, Vishanth
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS, AIAI 2013, 2013, 412 : 452 - 461