Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases

被引:30
|
作者
Farshid, G. [1 ]
Sullivan, T. [2 ]
Downey, P. [1 ]
Gill, P. G. [1 ]
Pieterse, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] BreastScreen SA & SA Pathol, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Data Management & Anal Ctr, Discipline Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
breast cancer; screening; mammography; microcalcifications; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; RISK-FACTORS; INTRADUCTAL-CARCINOMA; FOLLOW-UP; CANCER; LESIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; CALCIFICATIONS;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2011.466
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mammographic microcalcifications are associated with many benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer. Careful assessment criteria are required to minimise benign biopsies while optimising cancer diagnosis. We wished to evaluate the assessment outcomes of microcalcifications biopsied in the setting of population-based breast cancer screening. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2007, cases biopsied in which microcalcifications were the only imaging abnormality were included. Patient demographics, imaging features and final histology were subjected to statistical analysis to determine independent predictors of malignancy. RESULTS: In all, 2545 lesions, with a mean diameter of 21.8mm (s.d. 23.8 mm) and observed in patients with a mean age of 57.7 years (s.d. 8.4 years), were included. Using the grading system adopted by the RANZCR, the grade was 3 in 47.7%; 4 in 28.3% and 5 in 24.0%. After assessment, 1220 lesions (47.9%) were malignant (809 DCIS only, 411 DCIS with invasive cancer) and 1325 (52.1%) were non-malignant, including 122 (4.8%) premalignant lesions (lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Only 30.9% of the DCIS was of low grade. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, imaging grade, their pattern of distribution, presence of a palpable mass and detection after the first screening episode showed significant univariate associations with malignancy. On multivariate modeling imaging grade, mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, palpable mass and screening episode were retained as independent predictors of malignancy. Radiological grade had the largest effect with lesions of grade 4 and 5 being 2.2 and 3.3 times more likely to be malignant, respectively, than grade 3 lesions. CONCLUSION: The radiological grading scheme used throughout Australia and parts of Europe is validated as a useful system of stratifying microcalcifications into groups with significantly different risks of malignancy. Biopsy assessment of appropriately selected microcalcifications is an effective method of detecting invasive breast cancer and DCIS, particularly of non-low-grade subtypes. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1669-1675. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.466 www.bjcancer.com
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1675
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Tupper, Carl A.
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Astley, Susan
    Bydder, Megan
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Harkness, Elaine
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Wilson, Mary
    Morris, Julie
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [32] Recall and Outcome of Screen-detected Microcalcifications during 2 Decades of Mammography Screening in the Netherlands National Breast Screening Program
    Luiten, Jacky D.
    Voogd, Adri C.
    Luiten, Ernest J. T.
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Roes, Kit C. B.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2020, 294 (03) : 528 - 537
  • [33] Prognosis of small screen-detected invasive breast cancers
    Ellis, I.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10 (Suppl 3)
  • [34] Diagnostic role of cytology in screen-detected breast cancer
    McKee, G
    Kissin, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (12) : 1797 - 1798
  • [35] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Carl A Tupper
    Anthony J Maxwell
    Susan Astley
    Megan Bydder
    Soujanya Gadde
    Elaine Harkness
    Yit Y Lim
    Mary Wilson
    Julie Morris
    Breast Cancer Research, 17
  • [36] Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Gilliland, FD
    Joste, N
    Stauber, PM
    Hunt, WC
    Rosenberg, R
    Redlich, G
    Key, CR
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (09) : 743 - 749
  • [37] Diagnostic role of cytology in screen-detected breast cancer
    Yiangou, C
    Davis, J
    Livni, N
    Barrett, NK
    Sinnett, HD
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (06) : 816 - 819
  • [38] Molecular comparison of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Cheasley, Dane
    Li, Na
    Rowley, Simone M.
    Elder, Kenneth
    Mann, G. Bruce
    Loi, Sherene
    Savas, Peter
    Goode, David L.
    Kader, Tanjina
    Zethoven, Magnus
    Semple, Tim
    Fox, Stephen B.
    Pang, Jia-Min
    Byrne, David
    Devereux, Lisa
    Nickson, Carolyn
    Procopio, Pietro
    Lee, Grant
    Hughes, Siobhan
    Saunders, Hugo
    Fujihara, Kenji M.
    Kuykhoven, Keilly
    Connaughton, Jacquie
    James, Paul A.
    Gorringe, Kylie L.
    Campbell, Ian G.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2019, 248 (02): : 243 - 252
  • [39] Prognosis of small screen-detected invasive breast cancers
    I Ellis
    Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [40] Tumor characteristics in screen-detected and symptomatic breast cancers
    Palka, Istvan
    Kelemen, Gyoengyi
    Ormandi, Katalin
    Lazar, Gyoergy
    Nyari, Tibor
    Thurzo, Laszlo
    Kahan, Zsuzsanna
    PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2008, 14 (02) : 161 - 167