Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases

被引:30
|
作者
Farshid, G. [1 ]
Sullivan, T. [2 ]
Downey, P. [1 ]
Gill, P. G. [1 ]
Pieterse, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] BreastScreen SA & SA Pathol, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Data Management & Anal Ctr, Discipline Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
breast cancer; screening; mammography; microcalcifications; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; RISK-FACTORS; INTRADUCTAL-CARCINOMA; FOLLOW-UP; CANCER; LESIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; CALCIFICATIONS;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2011.466
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mammographic microcalcifications are associated with many benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer. Careful assessment criteria are required to minimise benign biopsies while optimising cancer diagnosis. We wished to evaluate the assessment outcomes of microcalcifications biopsied in the setting of population-based breast cancer screening. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2007, cases biopsied in which microcalcifications were the only imaging abnormality were included. Patient demographics, imaging features and final histology were subjected to statistical analysis to determine independent predictors of malignancy. RESULTS: In all, 2545 lesions, with a mean diameter of 21.8mm (s.d. 23.8 mm) and observed in patients with a mean age of 57.7 years (s.d. 8.4 years), were included. Using the grading system adopted by the RANZCR, the grade was 3 in 47.7%; 4 in 28.3% and 5 in 24.0%. After assessment, 1220 lesions (47.9%) were malignant (809 DCIS only, 411 DCIS with invasive cancer) and 1325 (52.1%) were non-malignant, including 122 (4.8%) premalignant lesions (lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Only 30.9% of the DCIS was of low grade. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, imaging grade, their pattern of distribution, presence of a palpable mass and detection after the first screening episode showed significant univariate associations with malignancy. On multivariate modeling imaging grade, mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, palpable mass and screening episode were retained as independent predictors of malignancy. Radiological grade had the largest effect with lesions of grade 4 and 5 being 2.2 and 3.3 times more likely to be malignant, respectively, than grade 3 lesions. CONCLUSION: The radiological grading scheme used throughout Australia and parts of Europe is validated as a useful system of stratifying microcalcifications into groups with significantly different risks of malignancy. Biopsy assessment of appropriately selected microcalcifications is an effective method of detecting invasive breast cancer and DCIS, particularly of non-low-grade subtypes. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1669-1675. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.466 www.bjcancer.com
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1675
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Added value of second biopsy target in screen-detected widespread suspicious breast calcifications
    Falkner, Nathalie M.
    Hince, Dana
    Porter, Gareth
    Dessauvagie, Ben
    Jeganathan, Sanjay
    Bulsara, Max
    Lo, Glen
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 62 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [22] Mammotome biopsy in the management of screen-detected breast lesions: Experience of a large screening centre
    Kumaraswamy, V.
    Liston, J.
    Coast, G.
    Lane, S.
    Hanby, A.
    Shaaban, A.
    JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 2006, 210 : 35 - 35
  • [23] Molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer
    Gelareh Farshid
    David Walters
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 172 : 191 - 199
  • [24] Molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer
    Farshid, Gelareh
    Walters, David
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 172 (01) : 191 - 199
  • [25] Core imprint cytology of screen-detected breast lesions is predictive of the histologic results
    Farshid, G
    Pieterse, S
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2006, 108 (03): : 150 - 156
  • [26] An Audit of the Results of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Mammography versus Ultrasound Screen-Detected Breast Lesions
    Rhee, Sun Jung
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Ko, Eun Young
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2017, 45 (05) : 261 - 266
  • [27] Age and tumor size are predictors of lymph node involvement in screen-detected breast cancers
    Bare, M. B. Marisa
    Andreu, X.
    Real, J.
    Saez, E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 21 : 49 - 49
  • [28] Stereotactic core biopsy of an impalpable screen-detected breast lesion using acupuncture-analgesia
    English, R. E.
    Chen, J. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (994): : E208 - E210
  • [29] Should screen-detected breast cancers be managed differently?
    Krzyzanowska, MK
    Tannock, IF
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (16): : 1170 - 1171
  • [30] Breast tumor characteristics as predictors of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers
    Porter, PL
    El-Bastawissi, AY
    Mandelson, MT
    Lin, MG
    Khalid, N
    Watney, EA
    Cousens, L
    White, D
    Taplin, S
    White, E
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (23) : 2020 - 2028