Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases

被引:30
|
作者
Farshid, G. [1 ]
Sullivan, T. [2 ]
Downey, P. [1 ]
Gill, P. G. [1 ]
Pieterse, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] BreastScreen SA & SA Pathol, Wayville, SA 5034, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Data Management & Anal Ctr, Discipline Publ Hlth, Adelaide, SA, Australia
关键词
breast cancer; screening; mammography; microcalcifications; CARCINOMA IN-SITU; DUCTAL CARCINOMA; RISK-FACTORS; INTRADUCTAL-CARCINOMA; FOLLOW-UP; CANCER; LESIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; CALCIFICATIONS;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.2011.466
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Mammographic microcalcifications are associated with many benign lesions, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive cancer. Careful assessment criteria are required to minimise benign biopsies while optimising cancer diagnosis. We wished to evaluate the assessment outcomes of microcalcifications biopsied in the setting of population-based breast cancer screening. METHODS: Between January 1992 and December 2007, cases biopsied in which microcalcifications were the only imaging abnormality were included. Patient demographics, imaging features and final histology were subjected to statistical analysis to determine independent predictors of malignancy. RESULTS: In all, 2545 lesions, with a mean diameter of 21.8mm (s.d. 23.8 mm) and observed in patients with a mean age of 57.7 years (s.d. 8.4 years), were included. Using the grading system adopted by the RANZCR, the grade was 3 in 47.7%; 4 in 28.3% and 5 in 24.0%. After assessment, 1220 lesions (47.9%) were malignant (809 DCIS only, 411 DCIS with invasive cancer) and 1325 (52.1%) were non-malignant, including 122 (4.8%) premalignant lesions (lobular carcinoma in situ, atypical lobular hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Only 30.9% of the DCIS was of low grade. Mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, imaging grade, their pattern of distribution, presence of a palpable mass and detection after the first screening episode showed significant univariate associations with malignancy. On multivariate modeling imaging grade, mammographic extent of microcalcifications >15 mm, palpable mass and screening episode were retained as independent predictors of malignancy. Radiological grade had the largest effect with lesions of grade 4 and 5 being 2.2 and 3.3 times more likely to be malignant, respectively, than grade 3 lesions. CONCLUSION: The radiological grading scheme used throughout Australia and parts of Europe is validated as a useful system of stratifying microcalcifications into groups with significantly different risks of malignancy. Biopsy assessment of appropriately selected microcalcifications is an effective method of detecting invasive breast cancer and DCIS, particularly of non-low-grade subtypes. British Journal of Cancer (2011) 105, 1669-1675. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.466 www.bjcancer.com
引用
收藏
页码:1669 / 1675
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases
    G Farshid
    T Sullivan
    P Downey
    P G Gill
    S Pieterse
    British Journal of Cancer, 2011, 105 : 1669 - 1675
  • [2] Predictors of malignancy in screen-detected breast masses with indeterminate/equivocal (grade 3) imaging features
    Farshid, Gelareh
    Walker, Adrienne
    Battersby, Glenda
    Sullivan, Thomas
    Gill, P. Grantley
    Pieterse, Steve
    Downey, Peter
    BREAST, 2011, 20 (01): : 56 - 61
  • [3] Biopsy Outcomes in Screen Detected Microcalcifications
    Farshid, G.
    Sullivan, T.
    Downey, P.
    Gill, G.
    Pieterse, S.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2012, 92 : 38A - 38A
  • [4] Biopsy Outcomes in Screen Detected Microcalcifications
    Farshid, G.
    Sullivan, T.
    Downey, P.
    Gill, G.
    Pieterse, S.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2012, 25 : 38A - 38A
  • [5] Patient perceptions of breast biopsy procedures for screen-detected lesions
    Geller, BM
    Oppenheimer, RG
    Mickey, RM
    Worden, JK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (04) : 1063 - 1069
  • [6] Use of ultrasound in the assessment of screen-detected malignant microcalcifications
    MZ Mvere
    EJ Cornford
    JJ James
    Breast Cancer Research, 14
  • [7] Use of ultrasound in the assessment of screen-detected malignant microcalcifications
    Mvere, M. Z.
    Cornford, E. J.
    James, J. J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 14
  • [8] Does size matter? A review of screen-detected microcalcifications seen at breast screening assessment
    LIG Haigh
    Breast Cancer Research, 10
  • [9] Does size matter? A review of screen-detected microcalcifications seen at breast screening assessment
    Haigh, Lig
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2008, 10
  • [10] Overdiagnosis of screen-detected breast cancer
    Milch, Vivienne
    Aranda, Sanchia
    Canfell, Karen
    Varlow, Megan
    Roder, David M.
    Currow, David
    Anderiesz, Cleola
    Keefe, Dorothy
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2021, 214 (10) : 455 - +