Current options in the life cycle assessment of additive manufacturing products

被引:15
|
作者
Vytisk, Jan [1 ]
Koci, Vladimir [1 ,3 ]
Honus, Stanislav [1 ,2 ]
Vrtek, Mojmir [1 ]
机构
[1] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Energy Engn, 17 Listopadu 2172-15, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
[2] VSB Tech Univ Ostrava, Ctr ENET, 17 Listopadu 2172-15, Ostrava 70800, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Chem & Technol, Fac Environm Technol, Dept Environm Chem, Tech 5, Prague 16628 6, Czech Republic
来源
OPEN ENGINEERING | 2019年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
Additive Manufacturing; Energy and Mass Flow; Life Cycle Analysis; Life Cycle Assessment; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ECO-EFFICIENCY; ISO; 14040; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1515/eng-2019-0073
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Additive manufacturing (AM) is a manufacturing process that allows for the creation of a physical object from a digital model. Additive manufacturing has a number of advantages over the conventional methods, inter alia the production of very complex machinery components, and a lower consumption of raw materials. Thanks to these advantages, the technology has been booming recently. The paper compares the advantages and disadvantages of additive technologies in the context of environmental impacts using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The paper describes the most important aspects of additive manufacturing, reviews the basic principles and phases of LCA method, including its application in AM, and outlines selected publications dealing with LCA and additive technologies. In conclusion, we recommend the most suitable methodologies to assess environmental impacts of additive technologies. To be specific, LCA is suitable to assess AM as for the material and energy flows, and in general, research in this field is considered highly promising.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 682
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Toward automated life cycle assessment for additive manufacturing: A systematic review of influential parameters and framework design
    Naser, Ahmed Z.
    Defersha, Fantahun
    Pei, Eujin
    Zhao, Yaoyao Fiona
    Yang, Sheng
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2023, 41 : 253 - 274
  • [42] Using life cycle assessment to determine if high utilization is the dominant force for sustainable polymer additive manufacturing
    Shi, Yuan
    Faludi, Jeremy
    [J]. ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 35
  • [43] Life-cycle-assessment - Life-cycle inventory for detergent manufacturing
    Franke, M
    Kluppel, H
    Kirchert, K
    Olschewski, P
    [J]. TENSIDE SURFACTANTS DETERGENTS, 1995, 32 (06) : 508 - 514
  • [44] Life cycle assessment of food waste management options
    Lundie, S
    Peters, GM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2005, 13 (03) : 275 - 286
  • [45] Life cycle assessment of recycling options for polylactic acid
    Maga, Daniel
    Hiebel, Markus
    Thonemann, Nils
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 149 : 86 - 96
  • [46] Life Cycle Assessment of Australian fossil energy options
    May, JR
    Brennan, DJ
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2003, 81 (B5) : 317 - 330
  • [47] Life cycle assessment of bagasse waste management options
    Kiatkittipong, Worapon
    Wongsuchoto, Porntip
    Pavasant, Prasert
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 29 (05) : 1628 - 1633
  • [48] Plant Refurbishment Options Based on the Life Cycle Assessment
    Tomlinson, Stuart
    Wang, Chang J.
    Morgan, Colin
    [J]. E-ENGINEERING & DIGITAL ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOGY VII, PTS 1 AND 2, 2009, 16-19 : 1091 - 1095
  • [49] Life Cycle Assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options
    Wulf, Christina
    Reuss, Markus
    Grube, Thomas
    Zapp, Petra
    Robinius, Martin
    Hake, Juergen-Friedrich
    Stolten, Detlef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 199 : 431 - 443
  • [50] Life cycle assessment of municipal waste management options
    Sarigiannis, D. A.
    Handakas, E. J.
    Karakitsios, S. P.
    Gotti, A.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 193