Life Cycle Assessment of Australian fossil energy options

被引:20
|
作者
May, JR [1 ]
Brennan, DJ
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] CRC Clean Power Lignite, Mulgrave, Australia
关键词
life cycle assessment; technology assessment; electricity generation; fossil fuels; advanced technologies;
D O I
10.1205/095758203770224351
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Electricity generation in Australia has been almost entirely derived from combustion of its abundant fossil fuel resources. The consumption of these resources, and the emissions produced consequently, are known to impact upon the health of the local, regional, and global environment. To assist in planning Australia's future electricity supply, the environmental impacts from a number of likely fossil electricity production systems have been quantified using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method, and conclusions about their suitability derived. Extended systems from cradle to delivery have been defined for brown coal, black coal, and natural gas, utilizing both currently practised and advanced electricity generation technology. The export of black coal and natural gas (as LNG) for power generation overseas was also considered. For currently practised technologies, no one-fuel system has the most significant contribution to all impacts, and no single impact dominates. The most significant impacts were climate change for brown coal systems, acidification, eutrophication, and solid waste generation for black coal systems, and photochemical smog for natural gas systems. For each fuel, advanced technology systems showed reduced impacts compared with conventional technology systems, elucidating the considerable potential for environmental benefits from technological substitution. For immediate implementation, natural gas CCGT systems have distinct advantages for most impact categories.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 330
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of Australian fossil energy options (vol 81, pg 317, 2003)
    May, JR
    Brennan, DJ
    [J]. PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2004, 82 (B1) : 81 - 81
  • [2] Life cycle energy assessment of Australian secondary schools
    Ding, Grace K. C.
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2007, 35 (05): : 487 - 500
  • [3] Comparative life cycle assessment of bioenergy and fossil energy systems in Greece
    Nikolaou, A
    Kavadakis, G
    Panoutsou, C
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIOANL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL C, POSTERS, 2001, : 361 - 368
  • [4] LIFE CYCLE IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF FOSSIL FUELS
    Dinca, Cristian
    Badea, Adrian
    Apostol, Tiberiu
    [J]. UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2010, 72 (01): : 115 - 126
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of fossil fuels and bioethanol
    Hromadko, Jan
    Hromadko, Jiri
    Miler, Petr
    Hoenig, Vladimir
    Sterba, Pavel
    [J]. LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2009, 125 (11): : 320 - 323
  • [6] Assessment of energy recovery potential and analysis of environmental impacts of waste to energy options using life cycle assessment
    Kumar, Atul
    Samadder, Sukha Ranjan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 365
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of automobile/fuel options
    Maclean, HL
    Lave, LB
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (23) : 5445 - 5452
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of gasoline blending options
    Mata, TM
    Smith, RL
    Young, DM
    Costa, CAV
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (16) : 3724 - 3732
  • [9] Fission or fossil: Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production
    Solli, Christian
    Stromman, Anders Hammer
    Hertwich, Edgar G.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2006, 94 (10) : 1785 - 1794
  • [10] A review on Life Cycle Assessment, Life Cycle Energy Assessment and Life Cycle Carbon Emissions Assessment on buildings
    Chau, C. K.
    Leung, T. M.
    Ng, W. Y.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2015, 143 : 395 - 413