Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 7, critical appraisal of systematic review quality

被引：3
|
作者：
Brackett, Alexandria [1 ]
Batten, Janene [1 ]
机构：
[1] Harvey Cushing John Hay Whitney Med Lib, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
来源：
HEART & LUNG | 2022年 / 53卷
关键词：
Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Peer review; PRESS; AMSTAR; 2; JBI; ROBIS;
D O I：
10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.01.008
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Methodological transparency and reproducibility are essential for systematic reviews. Peer review of systematic review manuscripts ensures researchers achieve transparency and reproducibility. Using critical appraisal and quality assessment tools is a methodological way for peer reviewers to conduct a thorough critique to assess the rigor and transparency of the systematic review. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：32 / 35
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Conceptual Framework for Critical Appraisal in Systematic Mixed Studies Reviews
    Quan Nha Hong
    Pluye, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (04) : 446 - 460
  • [32] The quality of systematic reviews - Review is biased
    Senn, S
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7256): : 297 - 297
  • [33] A critical appraisal tool for systematic literature reviews in software engineering
    bin Ali, Nauman
    Usman, Muhammad
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 112 : 48 - 50
  • [34] Critical appraisal of systematic reviews of executive function treatments in TBI
    Raymer, Anastasia M.
    Roitsch, Jane
    Redman, Rachael
    Michalek, Anne M. P.
    Johnson, Rachel K.
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2018, 32 (13-14) : 1601 - 1611
  • [35] Quality appraisal of spatial epidemiology and health geography research: A scoping review of systematic reviews
    Wood, Sarah M.
    Alston, Laura
    Beks, Hannah
    Mc Namara, Kevin
    Coffee, Neil T.
    Clark, Robyn A.
    Shee, Anna Wong
    Versace, Vincent L.
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2023, 83
  • [36] Critical appraisal of methodological quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis in Paediatric Dentistry journals
    Jayaraman, Jayakumar
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob
    Innes, Nicola P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 28 (06) : 548 - 560
  • [37] QUALITY CRITERIA OF CLINIMETRIC PROPERTIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS
    Mokkink, Lidwine B.
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    de Vet, Henrica C.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (09) : 2074 - 2074
  • [38] Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review
    Zorzela, Liliane
    Golder, Su
    Liu, Yali
    Pilkington, Karen
    Hartling, Lisa
    Joffe, Ari
    Loke, Yoon
    Vohra, Sunita
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 348
  • [39] Reporting quality in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review
    Elshafay, Abdelrahman
    Omran, Esraa Salah
    Abdelkhalek, Mariam
    El-Badry, Mohamed Omar
    Eisa, Heba Gamal
    Fala, Salma Y.
    Dang, Thao
    Ghanem, Mohammad A. T.
    Elbadawy, Maha
    Elhady, Mohamed Tamer
    Nguyen Lam Vuong
    Hirayama, Kenji
    Nguyen Tien Huy
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2019, 35 (09) : 1631 - 1641
  • [40] A systematic review and critical appraisal of menopause guidelines
    Hemachandra, Chandima
    Taylor, Sasha
    Islam, Rakibul M.
    Fooladi, Ensieh
    Davis, Susan R.
    [J]. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 50 (02) : 122 - 138
12345