Quality appraisal of spatial epidemiology and health geography research: A scoping review of systematic reviews

被引：1
|
作者：
Wood, Sarah M. [1 ,7 ]
Alston, Laura [1 ,2 ]
Beks, Hannah [1 ]
Mc Namara, Kevin [1 ,3 ]
Coffee, Neil T. [1 ,4 ]
Clark, Robyn A. [5 ,6 ]
Shee, Anna Wong [1 ,3 ]
Versace, Vincent L. [1 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Med, Deakin Rural Hlth, Warrnambool Campus, Warrnambool, Vic, Australia
[2] Colac Area Hlth, Res Unit, Colac, Vic, Australia
[3] Grampians Hlth, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Australian Ctr Housing Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[5] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Southern Adelaide Hlth Care Serv, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[7] Deakin Univ, Fac Hlth, Sch Med, Deakin Rural Hlth, Warrnambool Campus,POB 423, Warrnambool, Vic 3280, Australia
来源：
HEALTH & PLACE | 2023年 / 83卷
关键词：
Health geography; Spatial epidemiology; Systematic review; Quality appraisal; Critical appraisal; Methodological quality; BUILT-ENVIRONMENT ATTRIBUTES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; FOOD ENVIRONMENT; BLUE SPACES; ASSOCIATIONS; EXPOSURE; BENEFITS; PROJECT; OBESITY;
D O I：
10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.103108
中图分类号：
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号：
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要：
A scoping review of peer-reviewed literature was conducted to understand how systematic reviews assess the methodological quality of spatial epidemiology and health geography research. Fifty-nine eligible reviews were identified and included. Variations in the use of quality appraisal tools were found. Reviews applied existing quality appraisal tools with no adaptations (n = 32; 54%), existing quality appraisal tools with adaptations (n = 9; 15%), adapted tools or methods from other reviews (n = 13; 22%), and developed new quality appraisal tools for the review (n = 5; 8%). Future research should focus on developing and validating a quality appraisal tool that evaluates the spatial methodology within studies.
引用
收藏
页数：12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Health promotion in schools: a scoping review of systematic reviews
    Chilton, Roy
    Pearson, Mark
    Anderson, Rob
    [J]. HEALTH EDUCATION, 2015, 115 (3-4) : 357 - 376
  • [2] Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review
    Ryan Chow
    Allen Li
    Nicole Wu
    Morgan Martin
    Jocelyn M. Wessels
    Warren G. Foster
    [J]. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2021, 304 : 1417 - 1426
  • [3] Quality appraisal of systematic reviews on methods of labour induction: a systematic review
    Chow, Ryan
    Li, Allen
    Wu, Nicole
    Martin, Morgan
    Wessels, Jocelyn M.
    Foster, Warren G.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2021, 304 (06) : 1417 - 1426
  • [4] Improving the quality of myofascial release research - A critical appraisal of systematic reviews
    Ajimsha, M. S.
    Shenoy, Pramod D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2019, 23 (03) : 561 - 567
  • [5] Global spatial epidemiology of rabies: Systematic review and critical appraisal of methods
    Mshelbwala, P.
    Weese, S.
    Mamun, A.
    Magalhaes, R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 101 : 321 - 321
  • [6] ChatGPT for Systematic and Scoping Reviews in Public Health Research: An Applicable Approach
    Miranda, P.
    Kaur, J.
    Abhari, S.
    Morita, P. P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [7] Characteristics and quality of systematic reviews led by Peruvian authors: A scoping review
    Branez-Condorena, Ana
    Soriano-Moreno, David R.
    Mejia, Jhonatan R.
    Chavez-Rimache, Lesly
    Fernandez-Guzman, Daniel
    Martinez-Rivera, Raisa N.
    Becerra-Chauca, Naysha
    Delgado-Flores, Carolina J.
    Taype-Rondan, Alvaro
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (17)
  • [8] Ensuring rigor in systematic reviews: Part 7, critical appraisal of systematic review quality
    Brackett, Alexandria
    Batten, Janene
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2022, 53 : 32 - 35
  • [9] CAT HPPR: a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of systematic, rapid, and scoping reviews investigating interventions in health promotion and prevention
    Heise, Thomas L.
    Seidler, Andreas
    Girbig, Maria
    Freiberg, Alice
    Alayli, Adrienne
    Fischer, Maria
    Hass, Wolfgang
    Zeeb, Hajo
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [10] CAT HPPR: a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of systematic, rapid, and scoping reviews investigating interventions in health promotion and prevention
    Thomas L. Heise
    Andreas Seidler
    Maria Girbig
    Alice Freiberg
    Adrienne Alayli
    Maria Fischer
    Wolfgang Haß
    Hajo Zeeb
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 22
12345