Public service motivation, prosocial behaviours, and career ambitions

被引:36
|
作者
Piatak, Jaclyn Schede [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
关键词
Careers; Human resource management; Motivation (psychology); Education; Social capital; Public sector organizations; CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; SECTOR; ORGANIZATIONS; DECISIONS; ISSUES; CHOICE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/IJM-12-2014-0248
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the behavioural consequences of public service motivation (PSM) and how motivation relates to an individual's call to serve both inside and outside of the workplace. More specifically, this study examines whether and how PSM relates to prosocial behaviours - volunteering and giving - and career ambitions to work in the government or non-profit sector among public affair graduate students. Design/methodology/approach - Logistic regression is used to examine the PSM link using a composite of the 40-item scale, each of the six dimensions - commitment to the public interest, civic duty, social justice, attraction to policymaking, compassion, and self-sacrifice - and the five-item scale from the Merit Principles Survey. The analyses draw upon data from a unique online survey of 122 graduate students in Master of Public Administration and Master of Public Policy programmes. Findings - The results indicate that people with higher levels of PSM are more likely to want to work in public service and volunteer. However, mixed results were found for the relationship between PSM and giving charitable donations and career ambitions to work in government and no link was found for career ambitions to work in the non-profit sector. Originality/value - This paper answers calls to examine the dimensions of PSM and examines Perry's (1996) original conception. The results provide practical implications for human resource managers as well as non-profit and public managers in recruiting and retaining employees and volunteers.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 821
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prosocial Behavior and Public Service Motivation
    Esteve, Marc
    Urbig, Diemo
    van Witteloostuijn, Arjen
    Boyne, George
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2016, 76 (01) : 177 - 187
  • [2] Public service motivation and prosocial motivation: two sides of the same coin?
    Ritz, Adrian
    Schott, Carina
    Nitzl, Christian
    Alfes, Kerstin
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 22 (07) : 974 - 998
  • [3] Prosocial Behaviors: A Matter of Altruism or Public Service Motivation?
    Piatak, Jaclyn S.
    Holt, Stephen B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2020, 30 (03) : 504 - 518
  • [4] Public Service Motivation, Prosocial Motivation and Altruism: Towards Disentanglement and Conceptual Clarity
    Schott, Carina
    Neumann, Oliver
    Baertschi, Muriel
    Ritz, Adrian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 42 (14) : 1200 - 1211
  • [5] Public or nonprofit? Career preferences and dimensions of public service motivation
    Ballart, Xavier
    Rico, Guillem
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 96 (02) : 404 - 420
  • [6] Prosocial Motivation and Customer Service
    Yu, Jun
    Zhou, Joyce
    Chen, Fakui
    [J]. 2014 CHINA MARKETING INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - CHINA'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO MARKETING: THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2014, : 263 - 265
  • [7] The antecedents of prosocial service behaviours: An empirical investigation
    Ackfeldt, Anna-Lena
    Wong, Veronica
    [J]. SERVICE INDUSTRIES JOURNAL, 2006, 26 (07): : 727 - 745
  • [8] Career sacrifice unpacked: From prosocial motivation to regret
    Zikic, Jelena
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [9] Is Public Service Motivation a Better Explanation of Nonprofit Career Preferences Than Government Career Preferences?
    Bright, Leonard
    [J]. PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 45 (04) : 405 - 424
  • [10] PROSOCIAL MOTIVATION AND PRESENTEEISM IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS
    Lanfranchi, Joseph
    Lemoyne, Priscilla
    [J]. REVUE ECONOMIQUE, 2020, 71 (06): : 1101 - 1132