A MEAN SCORE METHOD FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS TO DEPARTURES FROM THE MISSING AT RANDOM ASSUMPTION IN RANDOMISED TRIALS

被引:21
|
作者
White, Ian R. [1 ,2 ]
Carpenter, James [3 ,4 ]
Horton, Nicholas J. [5 ]
机构
[1] UCL, MRC Biostat Unit, London, England
[2] UCL, MRC Clin Trials Unit, Stat Methods Med, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, 90 High Holborn,2nd Floor, London WC1V 6LJ, England
[3] UCL, MRC Clin Trials Unit, Inst Clin Trials & Methodol, 90 High Holborn,2nd Floor, London WC1V 6LJ, England
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, London, England
[5] Amherst Coll, Dept Math & Stat, POB 5000,AC 2239, Amherst, MA 01002 USA
关键词
Intention-to-treat analysis; longitudinal data analysis; mean score; missing data; randomised trials; sensitivity analysis; PATTERN-MIXTURE MODELS; TO-TREAT ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL DATA; COVARIATE DATA; OUTCOME DATA; DROP-OUT; BIAS; METAANALYSIS; IMPUTATION; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.5705/ss.202016.0308
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Most analyses of randomised trials with incomplete outcomes make untestable assumptions and should therefore be subjected to sensitivity analyses. However, methods for sensitivity analyses are not widely used. We propose a mean score approach for exploring global sensitivity to departures from missing at random or other assumptions about incomplete outcome data in a randomised trial. We assume a single outcome analysed under a generalised linear model. One or more sensitivity parameters, specified by the user, measure the degree of departure from missing at random in a pattern mixture model. Advantages of our method are that its sensitivity parameters are relatively easy to interpret and so can be elicited from subject matter experts; it is fast and non-stochastic; and its point estimate, standard error and confidence interval agree perfectly with standard methods when particular values of the sensitivity parameters make those standard methods appropriate. We illustrate the method using data from a mental health trial.
引用
收藏
页码:1985 / 2003
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sensitivity Analysis of Multiple Informant Models When Data Are Not Missing at Random
    Blozis, Shelley A.
    Ge, Xiaojia
    Xu, Shu
    Natsuaki, Misaki N.
    Shaw, Daniel S.
    Neiderhiser, Jenae M.
    Scaramella, Laura V.
    Leve, Leslie D.
    Reiss, David
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 20 (02) : 283 - 298
  • [22] SENSITIVITY OF POWER IN ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE TO DEPARTURES FROM IN-BUILT ASSUMPTIONS
    KANJI, GK
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES D-THE STATISTICIAN, 1976, 25 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [23] Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials: protocol for a systematic review
    Fiero, Mallorie
    Huang, Shuang
    Bell, Melanie L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (05):
  • [24] Global sensitivity analysis of clinical trials with missing patient-reported outcomes
    Scharfstein, Daniel O.
    McDermott, Aidan
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (05) : 1439 - 1456
  • [25] Sensitivity analysis for nonignorable missing responses with application to multivariate Random effect model
    Samani E.B.
    Ganjali M.
    METRON, 2011, 69 (3) : 309 - 322
  • [26] Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach
    Carpenter, James R.
    Kenward, Michael G.
    White, Ian R.
    STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (03) : 259 - 275
  • [27] A multiple imputation-based sensitivity analysis approach for regression analysis with an missing not at random covariate
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    He, Yulei
    Hu, Chengcheng
    Zhou, Wei
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (14) : 2275 - 2292
  • [28] Missing not at random in end of life care studies: multiple imputation and sensitivity analysis on data from the ACTION study
    Giulia Carreras
    Guido Miccinesi
    Andrew Wilcock
    Nancy Preston
    Daan Nieboer
    Luc Deliens
    Mogensm Groenvold
    Urska Lunder
    Agnes van der Heide
    Michela Baccini
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 21
  • [29] Missing not at random in end of life care studies: multiple imputation and sensitivity analysis on data from the ACTION study
    Carreras, Giulia
    Miccinesi, Guido
    Wilcock, Andrew
    Preston, Nancy
    Nieboer, Daan
    Deliens, Luc
    Groenvold, Mogensm
    Lunder, Urska
    van der Heide, Agnes
    Baccini, Michela
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [30] Biased estimation of adjusted odds ratios from incomplete covariate data due to violation of the missing at random assumption
    Vach, W
    Illi, S
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 39 (01) : 13 - 28