Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:78
|
作者
Meco, Massimo [1 ]
Montisci, Andrea [1 ]
Miceli, Antonio [1 ]
Panisi, Paolo [3 ]
Donatelli, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Cirri, Silvia [1 ]
Ferrarini, Matteo [1 ]
Lio, Antonio [1 ]
Glauber, Mattia [1 ]
机构
[1] Grp Osped San Donato, Ist Clin St Ambrogio, Cardiothorac Dept, Via Faravelli 16, I-20149 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Chair Cardiac Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Gavazzeni Hosp, Cardiac Ctr, Bergamo, Italy
来源
关键词
aortic stenosis; prosthetic heart valve; Sutureless bioprothesis; Perceval valve; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; STERNOTOMY; MINITHORACOTOMY; IMPLANTATION; DURATION; DIALYSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.006091
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundAortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease and has a dismal prognosis without surgical treatment. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively assess the comparative effectiveness of the Perceval (LivaNova) valve versus conventional aortic bioprostheses. Methods and ResultsA total of 6 comparative studies were identified, including 639 and 760 patients who underwent, respectively, aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless valve (P group) and with a conventional bioprosthesis (C group). Aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass duration were significantly lower in the P group. No difference in postoperative mortality was shown for the P and C groups (2.8% versus 2.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR]: 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-1.88]; P=0.98). Incidence of postoperative renal failure was lower in the P group compared with the C group (2.7% versus 5.5%; OR: 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]; P=0.007). Incidence of stroke (2.3% versus 1.7%; OR: 1.34 [95% CI, 0.56-3.21]; P=0.51) and paravalvular leak (3.1% versus 1.6%; OR: 2.52 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; P=0.21) was similar, whereas P group patients received fewer blood transfusions than C group patients (1.161.2 versus 2.13 +/- 2.2; mean difference: 0.99 [95% CI, -1.22 to -0.75]; P=0.001). The incidence of pacemaker implantation was higher in the P than the C group (7.9% versus 3.1%; OR: 2.45 [95% CI, 1.44-4.17]; P=0.001), whereas hemodynamic Perceval performance was better (transvalvular gradient 23.42 +/- 1.73 versus 22.8 +/- 1.86; mean difference: 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.18]; P=0.001), even during follow-up (10.98 +/- 5.7 versus 13.06 +/- 6.2; mean difference: -2.08 [95% CI, -3.96 to -0.21]; P=0.030). We found no difference in 1-year mortality. ConclusionsThe Perceval bioprosthesis improves the postoperative course compared with conventional bioprostheses and is an option for high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Randomized trial of stentless versus stented bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement
    Halstead, JC
    Tsui, SS
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (04): : 1338 - 1339
  • [22] Aortic Valve Replacement With Perceval Sutureless Valve is Associated With Lower Postoperative Stroke Volume Index Compared to Conventional Stented Valve in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Ventricular Function: A Propensity Matched Analysis
    Gambaro, Alessia
    Murphy, Michael O.
    Duncan, Alison
    Pepper, John
    Quarto, Cesare
    Rosendahl, Ulrich
    Asimakopoulos, George
    CIRCULATION, 2017, 136
  • [23] Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Replacement: Results of Two European Centers
    Folliguet, Thierry A.
    Laborde, Francois
    Zannis, Konstantinos
    Ghorayeb, Gabriel
    Haverich, Axel
    Shrestha, Malakh
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 93 (05): : 1483 - 1488
  • [24] Midterm outcomes of subcoronary stentless porcine valve versus stented aortic valve replacement
    Aranda-Michel, Edgar
    Bianco, Valentino
    Dufendach, Keith
    Kilic, Arman
    Habertheuer, Andreas
    Humar, Rishab
    Navid, Forozan
    Wang, Yisi
    Sultan, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2020, 35 (11) : 2950 - 2956
  • [25] Lifetime management when a redo is in the balance Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement or resurgical aortic valve replacement in degenerated bioprostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and midterm results
    Alasnag, Mirvat
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2022, 100 (01) : 131 - 132
  • [26] Aortic Valve Replacement with a Conventional Stented Bioprosthesis versus Sutureless Bioprosthesis: a Study of 763 Patients
    Mujtaba, Syed Saleem
    Ledingham, Simon M.
    Shah, Asif Raza
    Pillay, Thasee
    Schueler, Stephan
    Clark, Stephen
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 33 (02) : 122 - 128
  • [27] Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gozdek, Miroslaw
    Raffa, Giuseppe Maria
    Suwalski, Piotr
    Kolodziejczak, Michalina
    Anisimowicz, Lech
    Kubica, Jacek
    Navarese, Eliano Pio
    Kowalewski, Mariusz
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (03) : 495 - 504
  • [28] Conventional Biological versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Prostheses in Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement
    Zubarevich, Alina
    Szczechowicz, Marcin
    Arjomandi Rad, Arian
    Amanov, Lukman
    Ruhparwar, Arjang
    Weymann, Alexander
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [29] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT AND TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION IN BRAZIL
    Coutinho, B.
    Chirita-Parker, O.
    Okumura, L.
    Riveros, B. S.
    Nita, M. E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S562 - S562
  • [30] Sutureless aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phan, Kevin
    Tsai, Yi-Chin
    Niranjan, Nithya
    Bouchard, Denis
    Carrel, Thierry P.
    Dapunt, Otto E.
    Eichstaedt, Harald C.
    Fischlein, Theodor
    Gersak, Borut
    Glauber, Mattia
    Haverich, Axel
    Misfeld, Martin
    Oberwalder, Peter J.
    Santarpino, Giuseppe
    Shrestha, Malakh Lal
    Solinas, Marco
    Vola, Marco
    Yan, Tristan D.
    Di Eusanio, Marco
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 4 (02) : 100 - +