Conventional Biological versus Sutureless Aortic Valve Prostheses in Combined Aortic and Mitral Valve Replacement

被引:4
|
作者
Zubarevich, Alina [1 ]
Szczechowicz, Marcin [1 ]
Arjomandi Rad, Arian [2 ]
Amanov, Lukman [1 ]
Ruhparwar, Arjang [1 ]
Weymann, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, West German Heart & Vasc Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, D-45147 Essen, Germany
[2] Univ Oxford, Clin Acad Grad Sch, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
来源
LIFE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
Perceval; combined procedures; SAVR; SMVR; SU-AVR; multivalve disease; END-POINT DEFINITIONS; INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR; TRANSCATHETER; SURGERY; REGURGITATION; IMPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; REPAIR;
D O I
10.3390/life13030737
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Sutureless aortic valve prostheses have proven to provide a significant decrease in procedural, cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp time, leading to a significant reduction in mortality risk in elderly high-risk cohorts. In this study, we sought to review our institutional experience on the sutureless aortic valve replacement (SU-AVR) and the concomitant mitral valve replacement (SMVR), comparing the combined conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with SMVR. Methods and Material: Between March 2018 and July 2022, 114 consecutive patients underwent a combined aortic and mitral valve replacement at our institution. We stratified the patients according to the operative procedures into two groups and matched them 1:2: Group 1 underwent a combined conventional SAVR and SMVR (n = 46), and Group 2 included combined SU-AVR with Perceval prosthesis and SMVR (n = 23). Results: No significant differences in the preoperative characteristics were present. SU-AVR combined with SMVR demonstrated excellent haemodynamic performance, comparable to that of SAVR plus SMVR, with median postoperative gradients over the aortic valve of 4 mmHg (IQR 3.0-4.0) in Group 1 and 4 mmHg (IQR 3.0-4.0) in Group 2 (p = 0.67). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative major adverse events such as death, stroke, myocardial infarction and kidney failure between the groups. There was also no significant difference in the permanent pacemaker implantation rate, paravalvular leakage or valve dislocation. We also could not detect any significant difference in postoperative mortality between the groups. Conclusions: SU-AVR has proven to be a reliable alternative to conventional valve prostheses in patients with multivalve disease undergoing combined aortic and mitral valve replacement, offering shorter procedural time and outstanding hemodynamic performance compared to the conventional surgical method.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sutureless aortic valve replacement in a calcified homograft combined with mitral valve replacement
    Ferdi Akca
    Kayan Lam
    Ibrahim Özdemir
    Erwin Tan
    [J]. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 12
  • [2] Sutureless aortic valve replacement in a calcified homograft combined with mitral valve replacement
    Akca, Ferdi
    Lam, Kayan
    ozdemir, Ibrahim
    Tan, Erwin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 12
  • [3] Aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve prostheses
    Paolo Berretta
    Marco Di Eusanio
    [J]. Journal of Geriatric Cardiology, 2016, 13 (06) - 510
  • [4] Aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve prostheses
    Berretta, Paolo
    Di Eusanio, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (06) : 504 - 510
  • [5] Conventional Prostheses versus Sutureless Perceval for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis
    Colarossi, Giorgia
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Becker, Michael
    Arias, Jessica P.
    Autschbach, Ruediger
    Moza, Ajay
    Aljalloud, Ali
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 29 (03) : 107 - 124
  • [6] Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
    Borger, Michael A.
    Fischlein, Theodor J. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 161 (03): : 931 - 932
  • [7] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF SUTURELESS AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT VERSUS CONVENTIONAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT AND TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION IN BRAZIL
    Coutinho, B.
    Chirita-Parker, O.
    Okumura, L.
    Riveros, B. S.
    Nita, M. E.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2019, 22 : S562 - S562
  • [8] Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement
    Talwar, Sachin
    Mathur, Ankit
    Choudhary, Shiv Kumar
    Singh, Rajvir
    Kumar, Arkalgud Sampath
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2007, 84 (04): : 1219 - 1225
  • [9] Biological versus mechanical prostheses for aortic valve replacement
    Rodriguez-Caulo, Emiliano A.
    Blanco-Herrera, Oscar R.
    Berastegui, Elisabet
    Arias-Dachary, Javier
    Souaf-Khalafi, Souhayla
    Parody-Cuerda, Gertrudis
    Laguna, Gregorio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 165 (02): : 609 - +
  • [10] Sutureless aortic valve prostheses
    Bilkhu, Rajdeep
    Borger, Michael A.
    Briffa, Norman Paul
    Jahangiri, Marjan
    [J]. HEART, 2019, 105 : S16 - S20