Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Versus Conventional Stented Bioprostheses: Meta-Analysis of Postoperative and Midterm Results in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement

被引:78
|
作者
Meco, Massimo [1 ]
Montisci, Andrea [1 ]
Miceli, Antonio [1 ]
Panisi, Paolo [3 ]
Donatelli, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Cirri, Silvia [1 ]
Ferrarini, Matteo [1 ]
Lio, Antonio [1 ]
Glauber, Mattia [1 ]
机构
[1] Grp Osped San Donato, Ist Clin St Ambrogio, Cardiothorac Dept, Via Faravelli 16, I-20149 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Milan, Chair Cardiac Surg, Milan, Italy
[3] Humanitas Gavazzeni Hosp, Cardiac Ctr, Bergamo, Italy
来源
关键词
aortic stenosis; prosthetic heart valve; Sutureless bioprothesis; Perceval valve; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; RENAL-FAILURE; RISK-FACTORS; SURGERY; STERNOTOMY; MINITHORACOTOMY; IMPLANTATION; DURATION; DIALYSIS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.117.006091
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundAortic stenosis is the most common valvular disease and has a dismal prognosis without surgical treatment. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantitatively assess the comparative effectiveness of the Perceval (LivaNova) valve versus conventional aortic bioprostheses. Methods and ResultsA total of 6 comparative studies were identified, including 639 and 760 patients who underwent, respectively, aortic valve replacement with the Perceval sutureless valve (P group) and with a conventional bioprosthesis (C group). Aortic cross-clamping and cardiopulmonary bypass duration were significantly lower in the P group. No difference in postoperative mortality was shown for the P and C groups (2.8% versus 2.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR]: 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.52-1.88]; P=0.98). Incidence of postoperative renal failure was lower in the P group compared with the C group (2.7% versus 5.5%; OR: 0.45 [95% CI, 0.25-0.80]; P=0.007). Incidence of stroke (2.3% versus 1.7%; OR: 1.34 [95% CI, 0.56-3.21]; P=0.51) and paravalvular leak (3.1% versus 1.6%; OR: 2.52 [95% CI, 0.60-1.06]; P=0.21) was similar, whereas P group patients received fewer blood transfusions than C group patients (1.161.2 versus 2.13 +/- 2.2; mean difference: 0.99 [95% CI, -1.22 to -0.75]; P=0.001). The incidence of pacemaker implantation was higher in the P than the C group (7.9% versus 3.1%; OR: 2.45 [95% CI, 1.44-4.17]; P=0.001), whereas hemodynamic Perceval performance was better (transvalvular gradient 23.42 +/- 1.73 versus 22.8 +/- 1.86; mean difference: 0.90 [95% CI, 0.62-1.18]; P=0.001), even during follow-up (10.98 +/- 5.7 versus 13.06 +/- 6.2; mean difference: -2.08 [95% CI, -3.96 to -0.21]; P=0.030). We found no difference in 1-year mortality. ConclusionsThe Perceval bioprosthesis improves the postoperative course compared with conventional bioprostheses and is an option for high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Conventional Prostheses versus Sutureless Perceval for Aortic Valve Replacement: A Meta-Analysis
    Colarossi, Giorgia
    Migliorini, Filippo
    Becker, Michael
    Arias, Jessica P.
    Autschbach, Ruediger
    Moza, Ajay
    Aljalloud, Ali
    ANNALS OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 29 (03) : 107 - 124
  • [2] Sutureless versus conventional bioprostheses for aortic valve replacement in severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis
    Fischlein, Theodor
    Folliguet, Thierry
    Meuris, Bart
    Shrestha, Malakh L.
    Roselli, Eric E.
    McGlothlin, Anna
    Kappert, Utz
    Pfeiffer, Steffen
    Corbi, Pierre
    Lorusso, Roberto
    Fabre, Olivier
    Pinaud, Frederic
    Troise, Giovanni
    Kueri, Sami
    Siepe, Matthias
    Bonaros, Nikolaos
    Tan, Erwin
    Andreas, Martin
    Garcia-Puente, Julio
    Voisine, Pierre
    Rega, Filip
    Girdauskas, Evaldas
    Berastegui, Elisabet
    Hanke, Thorsten
    Kats, Suzanne
    Blasio, Andrea
    Muneretto, Claudio
    Repossini, Alberto
    Tribastone, Salvatore
    De Kerchove, Laurent
    Mikus, Elisa
    Solinas, Marco
    Rambaldini, Manfredo
    Chocron, Sidney
    De Bock, Dina
    Wang, Shaohua
    Grabenwoeger, Martin
    Raanani, Ehud
    Glauber, Mattia
    Maluenda, Gabriel
    Ramlawi, Basel
    Bouchard, Denis
    Johnston, Douglas
    Diegeler, Anno
    Bitran, Daniel
    Teoh, Kevin
    Vincentelli, Andre
    Castillo, Jose Cuenca
    Albat, Bernard
    Oberwalder, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 161 (03): : 920 - 931
  • [3] Outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement versus conventional aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement, updated systematic review, and meta-analysis
    Kim, Kevin S.
    Makhdoum, Ahmad
    Koziarz, Alex
    Gupta, Saurabh
    Alsagheir, Ali
    Pandey, Arjun
    Reza, Seleman
    Um, Kevin
    Teoh, Kevin
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    Lamy, Andre
    Yanagawa, Bobby
    Belley-Cote, Emilie P.
    Whitlock, Richard P.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2021, 36 (12) : 4734 - 4742
  • [4] Thrombocytopaenia after aortic valve replacement with stented, stentless and sutureless bioprostheses
    Stanger, Olaf
    Grabherr, Michael
    Gahl, Brigitta
    Longnus, Sarah
    Meinitzer, Andreas
    Fiedler, Martin
    Tevaearai, Hendrik
    Carrel, Thierry
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2017, 51 (02) : 340 - 346
  • [5] Meta-analysis of sutureless technology versus standard aortic valve replacement and transcatheter aortic valve replacement
    Qureshi, Saqib H.
    Boulemden, Anas
    Szafranek, Adam
    Vohra, Hunaid
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 53 (02) : 463 - 471
  • [6] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes of Sutureless versus Stented Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement
    Guner, Yesim
    Cicek, Ayse
    Karacalilar, Mehmet
    Ersoy, Burak
    Kyaruzi, Mugisha
    Onan, Burak
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 37 (03) : 328 - 334
  • [7] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Failure
    Kalra, Ankur
    Reyes, Manuel
    Yang, Eric Y.
    Little, Stephen H.
    Nabi, Faisal
    Barker, Colin M.
    Ramchandani, Mahesh
    Reul, Ross M.
    Reardon, Michael J.
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 29 (06): : E65 - E66
  • [8] Sutureless Perceval aortic valve implantation compared with conventional Mitroflow valve replacement
    Casha A.R.
    Manché A.
    Camilleri L.
    Yamagata K.
    Santucci S.
    Gauci M.
    Galea J.
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 34 (2) : 109 - 115
  • [9] Sutureless Perceval Aortic Valve Replacement in Aortic Homograft
    Folliguet, Thierry A.
    Laborde, Francois
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 96 (05): : 1866 - 1868
  • [10] Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation: Midterm Outcomes
    Szecel, Delphine
    Eurlings, Roxanne
    Rega, Filip
    Verbrugghe, Peter
    Meuris, Bart
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 111 (04): : 1331 - 1337