Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery

被引:56
|
作者
Rossitto, C. [1 ]
Cianci, S. [1 ]
Alletti, S. Gueli [1 ]
Perrone, E. [1 ]
Pizzacalla, S. [1 ]
Scambia, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Sacred Hearth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Hysterectomy; LESS; Percutaneous instruments; Mini-laparoscopy; Laparoscopy; Gynecology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: During the last decade endoscopic surgical procedures have been constantly evolving. The latest innovation in ultra-minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the percutaneous technology (Percuvance (TM) Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), Teleflex Inc., USA). We compared surgical outcome of hysterectomy, in a retrospective cohort study using the most recent MIS techniques as single-site (LESS) surgery, 3 mm laparoscopy (MiniLPS) and percutaneous system (PSS) with standard laparoscopy (LPS). Study design: This is a matched retrospective cohort study. Endometrial Hyperplasia/Early stage endometrial cancer or benign pathology were the indication for surgery. Data of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between May 2013 and April 2016 using PSS, LPS, MiniLPS, and LESS were collected and compared. Results: The characteristics of each group were similar. The median Operative time (OT) was significantly longer in LESS compared to all other groups (120 min [range 55-165] in LESS, 91 min [range 60-180] in MiniLPS, 70 min [range 55-230] in LPS and 65 [range 40-180] in PSS; p = 0.0001). No significant differences among the 4 groups were observed in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy, and intra e post-operative complications. Statistically significant differences were recorded in median VAS 24h (2 [range 0-3] in PSS, 2 [range 0-3] in MiniLPS, 3 [range 2-5] in LESS and 2 [range 1-5] in LPS; p = 0.0001). The average time of discharge was (1 day [range 1-3] in PSS, 1 day [range 1-2] in MiniLPS, 1 days [range 1-2] in LESS and 1 day [range 1-3] in LPS; p = 0.99). Conclusions: Data show that the effort to minimize the impact of surgical invasiveness can be feasible and could improve the advantages, not only in terms of aesthetic outcomes, even if the differences among the endoscopic approaches have not a relevant clinical impact. The technology innovations like PSS maintain the same triangulation between instruments as standard LPS with an evident decrease of the invasiveness thanks to reduced instruments size, even if the lack of suitability of bipolar energy, that require a multifunction instrument, remain a limit of these instruments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Percutaneous-assisted vs mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of ultra-minimally invasive approaches
    Cianci, Stefano
    Perrone, Emanuele
    Rossitto, Cristiano
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Tropea, Alessandro
    Biondi, Antonio
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Gueli Alletti, Salvatore
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2021, 73 (06) : 2347 - 2354
  • [32] Percutaneous-assisted vs mini-laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison of ultra-minimally invasive approaches
    Stefano Cianci
    Emanuele Perrone
    Cristiano Rossitto
    Francesco Fanfani
    Alessandro Tropea
    Antonio Biondi
    Giovanni Scambia
    Salvatore Gueli Alletti
    Updates in Surgery, 2021, 73 : 2347 - 2354
  • [33] Minimizing minimally invasive surgery: Current status of the single-port roboticsurgery in Urology
    Garisto, J.
    Bertolo, R.
    Reese, S. W.
    Bove, P.
    Kaouk, J.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2021, 45 (05): : 345 - 352
  • [34] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Adrenalectomy
    Fang, Andrew M.
    Fazendin, Jessica M.
    Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
    Porterfield, John R.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (05) : 1668 - 1672
  • [35] SINGLE-PORT LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY WITH MINIMALLY INVASIVE DOUBLE-RETRACTOR METHOD
    Widjaja, Jason
    Yang, Jianjun
    Gu, Yan
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 : 485 - 485
  • [36] Association of gum chewing with early gastrointestinal recovery in single-port laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
    Yin, Ya-Nan
    Xie, Hong
    Jiang, Ni-Jie
    Dai, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 (03): : 66 - 74
  • [37] Transumbilical single-port access versus conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy: surgical outcomes
    Yim, Ga Won
    Jung, Yong Wook
    Paek, Jiheum
    Lee, San Hui
    Kwon, Ha Yan
    Nam, Eun Ji
    Kim, Sunghoon
    Kim, Jae Hoon
    Kim, Young Tae
    Kim, Sang Wun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (01) : 26.e1 - 26.e6
  • [38] Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery: Case Report Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Under Regional Anesthesia
    Moawad, Nash S.
    Flores, Estefania Santamaria
    Le-Wendling, Linda
    Sumner, Martina T.
    Enneking, F. Kayser
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (06): : 1008 - 1010
  • [39] Comparison Between Robotic and Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Performed Using Single-Port Approach
    Ohwaki, Akiko
    Takada, Kyohei
    Kobayashi, Arata
    Ito, Mayuko
    Ichikawa, Ryoko
    Miyamura, Hironori
    Nishizawa, Haruki
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [40] Single-port laparoscopic surgery in huge ovarian tumors: Comparison to laparotomy
    Kim, J. S.
    Lee, I. O.
    Eoh, K. J.
    Chung, Y. S.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Nam, E. J.
    Kim, Y. T.
    Kim, J. W.
    Kim, S. W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2016, 26 : 907 - 907