Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery

被引:56
|
作者
Rossitto, C. [1 ]
Cianci, S. [1 ]
Alletti, S. Gueli [1 ]
Perrone, E. [1 ]
Pizzacalla, S. [1 ]
Scambia, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Sacred Hearth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Hysterectomy; LESS; Percutaneous instruments; Mini-laparoscopy; Laparoscopy; Gynecology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: During the last decade endoscopic surgical procedures have been constantly evolving. The latest innovation in ultra-minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the percutaneous technology (Percuvance (TM) Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), Teleflex Inc., USA). We compared surgical outcome of hysterectomy, in a retrospective cohort study using the most recent MIS techniques as single-site (LESS) surgery, 3 mm laparoscopy (MiniLPS) and percutaneous system (PSS) with standard laparoscopy (LPS). Study design: This is a matched retrospective cohort study. Endometrial Hyperplasia/Early stage endometrial cancer or benign pathology were the indication for surgery. Data of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between May 2013 and April 2016 using PSS, LPS, MiniLPS, and LESS were collected and compared. Results: The characteristics of each group were similar. The median Operative time (OT) was significantly longer in LESS compared to all other groups (120 min [range 55-165] in LESS, 91 min [range 60-180] in MiniLPS, 70 min [range 55-230] in LPS and 65 [range 40-180] in PSS; p = 0.0001). No significant differences among the 4 groups were observed in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy, and intra e post-operative complications. Statistically significant differences were recorded in median VAS 24h (2 [range 0-3] in PSS, 2 [range 0-3] in MiniLPS, 3 [range 2-5] in LESS and 2 [range 1-5] in LPS; p = 0.0001). The average time of discharge was (1 day [range 1-3] in PSS, 1 day [range 1-2] in MiniLPS, 1 days [range 1-2] in LESS and 1 day [range 1-3] in LPS; p = 0.99). Conclusions: Data show that the effort to minimize the impact of surgical invasiveness can be feasible and could improve the advantages, not only in terms of aesthetic outcomes, even if the differences among the endoscopic approaches have not a relevant clinical impact. The technology innovations like PSS maintain the same triangulation between instruments as standard LPS with an evident decrease of the invasiveness thanks to reduced instruments size, even if the lack of suitability of bipolar energy, that require a multifunction instrument, remain a limit of these instruments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Initial Experience with Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy: Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Conventional Multiport Approaches
    Gross, James T.
    Vetter, Joel M.
    Sands, Kenneth G.
    Palka, Joshua K.
    Bhayani, Sam B.
    Figenshau, Robert S.
    Kim, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2021, 35 (08) : 1177 - 1183
  • [22] Initial Experience of Single-Port Surgery Assisted by Percutaneous Instruments for Gastric Bypass: a Combination of Safety and Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Nikos Kotzampassakis
    Nikolaos Machairas
    Mathieu Clanet
    Pierre Cornet
    Anne-Catherine Dandrifosse
    Obesity Surgery, 2013, 23 : 267 - 271
  • [23] Initial Experience of Single-Port Surgery Assisted by Percutaneous Instruments for Gastric Bypass: a Combination of Safety and Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Kotzampassakis, Nikos
    Machairas, Nikolaos
    Clanet, Mathieu
    Cornet, Pierre
    Dandrifosse, Anne-Catherine
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2013, 23 (02) : 267 - 271
  • [24] Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery
    Keller, Deborah S.
    Reif de Paula, Thais
    Ikner, Taylor P.
    Saidi, Hela
    Schoonyoung, Henry
    H Marks, John
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, 38 (03): : 1568 - 1575
  • [25] A comparison of novel laparoscopic suturing techniques in single-port surgery
    Terzi, Hasan
    Biler, Alper
    Turkay, Unal
    Kale, Ahmet
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 28 (06) : 338 - 343
  • [26] Perioperative outcomes for single-port robotic versus single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a comparative analysis in colorectal cancer surgery
    Deborah S. Keller
    Thais Reif de Paula
    Taylor P. Ikner
    Hela Saidi
    Henry Schoonyoung
    John H Marks
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2024, 38 : 1568 - 1575
  • [27] Re: A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Cadeddu, Jeffrey A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (02): : 610 - 611
  • [28] A COMPARISON OF PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES BETWEEN TRANSUMBILICAL SINGLE-PORT ACCESS AND CONVENTIONAL LAPAROSCOPIC RENAL CYST MASUPIALIZATION
    Choi, J.
    Han, D.
    Jeong, B.
    Seo, S.
    Jeon, S.
    Lee, H.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2009, 23 : A232 - A232
  • [29] Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease
    Eom, Jeong Min
    Kim, Kye Hyun
    Yuk, Jin-Sung
    Roh, Sung Il
    Lee, Jung Hun
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (07): : 1850 - 1855
  • [30] Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease
    Jeong Min Eom
    Kye Hyun Kim
    Jin-Sung Yuk
    Sung Il Roh
    Jung Hun Lee
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2015, 29 : 1850 - 1855