Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery

被引:56
|
作者
Rossitto, C. [1 ]
Cianci, S. [1 ]
Alletti, S. Gueli [1 ]
Perrone, E. [1 ]
Pizzacalla, S. [1 ]
Scambia, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Sacred Hearth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
关键词
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Hysterectomy; LESS; Percutaneous instruments; Mini-laparoscopy; Laparoscopy; Gynecology; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: During the last decade endoscopic surgical procedures have been constantly evolving. The latest innovation in ultra-minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the percutaneous technology (Percuvance (TM) Percutaneous Surgical System (PSS), Teleflex Inc., USA). We compared surgical outcome of hysterectomy, in a retrospective cohort study using the most recent MIS techniques as single-site (LESS) surgery, 3 mm laparoscopy (MiniLPS) and percutaneous system (PSS) with standard laparoscopy (LPS). Study design: This is a matched retrospective cohort study. Endometrial Hyperplasia/Early stage endometrial cancer or benign pathology were the indication for surgery. Data of laparoscopic hysterectomies performed between May 2013 and April 2016 using PSS, LPS, MiniLPS, and LESS were collected and compared. Results: The characteristics of each group were similar. The median Operative time (OT) was significantly longer in LESS compared to all other groups (120 min [range 55-165] in LESS, 91 min [range 60-180] in MiniLPS, 70 min [range 55-230] in LPS and 65 [range 40-180] in PSS; p = 0.0001). No significant differences among the 4 groups were observed in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparoscopy or laparotomy, and intra e post-operative complications. Statistically significant differences were recorded in median VAS 24h (2 [range 0-3] in PSS, 2 [range 0-3] in MiniLPS, 3 [range 2-5] in LESS and 2 [range 1-5] in LPS; p = 0.0001). The average time of discharge was (1 day [range 1-3] in PSS, 1 day [range 1-2] in MiniLPS, 1 days [range 1-2] in LESS and 1 day [range 1-3] in LPS; p = 0.99). Conclusions: Data show that the effort to minimize the impact of surgical invasiveness can be feasible and could improve the advantages, not only in terms of aesthetic outcomes, even if the differences among the endoscopic approaches have not a relevant clinical impact. The technology innovations like PSS maintain the same triangulation between instruments as standard LPS with an evident decrease of the invasiveness thanks to reduced instruments size, even if the lack of suitability of bipolar energy, that require a multifunction instrument, remain a limit of these instruments. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 129
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes
    Fanfani, Francesco
    Fagotti, Anna
    Rossitto, Cristiano
    Gagliardi, Maria Lucia
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    Gallotta, Valerio
    Alletti, Salvatore Gueli
    Monterossi, Giorgia
    Turco, Luigi Carlo
    Scambia, Giovanni
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (12): : 3592 - 3596
  • [2] Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic and single-port hysterectomy: perioperative outcomes
    Francesco Fanfani
    Anna Fagotti
    Cristiano Rossitto
    Maria Lucia Gagliardi
    Alfredo Ercoli
    Valerio Gallotta
    Salvatore Gueli Alletti
    Giorgia Monterossi
    Luigi Carlo Turco
    Giovanni Scambia
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 3592 - 3596
  • [3] Single-port laparoscopic surgery: Is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery?
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (02) : 143 - 144
  • [4] Single-Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology Outcomes and Feasibility
    Figurelli, Justine
    Bresson, Lucie
    Narducci, Fabrice
    Katdare, Ninad
    Coulon, Pascale
    Fournier, Charles
    Leblanc, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2014, 24 (06) : 1126 - 1132
  • [5] Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
    Kim, Jeong-Min
    Lee, Seon-Mi
    Seol, Aeran
    Song, Jae-Yun
    Ryu, Ki-Jin
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Park, Hyun-Tae
    Cho, Hyun-Woong
    Min, Kyung-Jin
    Hong, Jin-Hwa
    Lee, Jae-Kwan
    Lee, Nak-Woo
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [6] A Review of Minimally Invasive Single-Port/Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy
    Rehman, Haroon
    Mathews, Tim
    Ahmed, Irfan
    JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 22 (07): : 641 - 646
  • [7] Minimally invasive surgery in urogynecology: a comparison of standard laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, percutaneous surgical system, and robotic sacral colpopexy
    Panico, Giovanni
    Campagna, Giuseppe
    Vacca, Lorenzo
    Caramazza, Daniela
    Iannone, Vito
    Rossitto, Cristiano
    Rumolo, Valerio
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ercoli, Alfredo
    MINERVA MEDICA, 2021, 112 (04) : 483 - 491
  • [8] Comparison of the minimally invasive surgical methods of the cholelithiasis treatment: single-port and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Klymenko, V. N.
    Syvolap, D. V.
    Kravchenko, B. S.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, (04) : 62 - 67
  • [9] Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Single-Port Access without Vaginal Surgery
    Langebrekke, Anton
    Qvigstad, Erik
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 16 (05) : 609 - 611
  • [10] Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon’s experience
    Maria Lee
    Sang Wun Kim
    Eun Ji Nam
    Ga Won Yim
    Sunghoon Kim
    Young Tae Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 1318 - 1324