Applying different resampling strategies in machine learning models to predict head-cut gully erosion susceptibility

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Fengjie [1 ]
Sahana, Mehebub [2 ]
Pahlevanzadeh, Bahareh [3 ]
Pal, Subodh Chandra [4 ]
Shit, Pravat Kumar [5 ]
Piran, Md Jalil [6 ]
Janizadeh, Saeid [7 ]
Band, Shahab S. [8 ]
Mosavi, Amir [9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Donghua Univ, Coll Sci, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Reg Informat Ctr Sci & Technol RICeST, Res Dept Design & Syst Operat, Shiraz, Fars, Iran
[4] Univ Burdwan, Dept Geog, Barddhaman 713104, W Bengal, India
[5] Dept Geog & Environm Management, Medinipur, India
[6] Sejeong Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul 05006, South Korea
[7] Tarbiat Modares Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Marine Sci, Dept Watershed Management Engn & Sci, Tehran 14115111, Iran
[8] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Future, Future Technol Res Ctr, 123 Univ Rd,Sect 3, Touliu 64002, Yunlin, Taiwan
[9] Oxford Brookes Univ, Sch Built Environm, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[10] Obuda Univ, John von Neumann Fac Informat, H-1034 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
Head-cut gully erosion; Resampling algorithms; Bootstrap; K-fold cross validation; Machine learning; Boosted regression tree; Support vector machine; Random forest; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; PERFORMANCE; ENSEMBLE; ALGORITHM; REGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2021.04.026
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Gully erosion is one of the advanced forms of water erosion. Identifying the effective fac-tors and gully erosion predicting is one of the important tools to control and manage such phe-nomenon. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of four different resampling algorithms including cross-validation (5-fold and 10-fold) and bootstrapping (Bootstrap and Opti-mism bootstrap) on boosted regression tree (BRT), support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) models in spatial modeling and evaluation of head-cut gully erosion in Konduran watershed. For this purpose, based on an extensive field survey, the points of the head-cut of the gully erosion were identified first, and a map of the distribution of head-cut gully erosion in the study area was prepared. Then 18 variable identify and prepare as factors affecting the occurrence of head-cut gully erosion. To assess the efficiency of the models, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) were used. that...>The results of the assessment indicated that the use of resampling algorithms increases the efficiency of the models. The integrated optimism-bootstrap-BRT, optimism-bootstrap-SVM, and Optimism-Bootstrap-RF models with AUC 0.85, 0.823 and 0.89 respectively, outperformed the cross-validation 5fold (BRT, SVM, RF), Cross-validation 10fold (BRT, SVM, RF) and Bootstrap (BRT, SVM, RF) integrated algorithms. (C) 2021 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier BV on behalf of Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University.
引用
收藏
页码:5813 / 5829
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Optimizing machine learning algorithms for spatial prediction of gully erosion susceptibility with four training scenarios
    Liu, Guoqing
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Santosh, M.
    Nalivan, Omid Asadi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (16) : 46979 - 46996
  • [32] Optimizing machine learning algorithms for spatial prediction of gully erosion susceptibility with four training scenarios
    Guoqing Liu
    Alireza Arabameri
    M. Santosh
    Omid Asadi Nalivan
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 46979 - 46996
  • [33] Machine Learning-Based Gully Erosion Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Eastern India
    Saha, Sunil
    Roy, Jagabandhu
    Arabameri, Alireza
    Blaschke, Thomas
    Dieu Tien Bui
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (05)
  • [34] Assessing the performance of GIS- based machine learning models with different accuracy measures for determining susceptibility to gully erosion (vol 664, pg 1117, 2019)
    Garosi, Younes
    Sheklabadi, Mohsen
    Conoscenti, Christian
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Van Oost, Kristof
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 730
  • [35] Gully Erosion Susceptibility Assessment in the Kondoran Watershed Using Machine Learning Algorithms and the Boruta Feature Selection
    Ahmadpour, Hamed
    Bazrafshan, Ommolbanin
    Rafiei-Sardooi, Elham
    Zamani, Hossein
    Panagopoulos, Thomas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [36] Robustness analysis of machine learning classifiers in predicting spatial gully erosion susceptibility with altered training samples
    Hembram, Tusar Kanti
    Saha, Sunil
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Maulud, Khairul Nizam Abdul
    Alamri, Abdullah M.
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) : 794 - 828
  • [37] A comparative assessment of gully erosion spatial predictive modeling using statistical and machine learning models
    Soleimanpour, Seyed Masoud
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Zare, Maryam
    [J]. CATENA, 2021, 207
  • [38] Susceptibility Mapping of Soil Water Erosion Using Machine Learning Models
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Sajedi-Hosseini, Farzaneh
    Choubin, Bahram
    Taromideh, Fereshteh
    Rahi, Gholamreza
    Dineva, Adrienn A.
    [J]. WATER, 2020, 12 (07)
  • [39] Different Machine Learning Models to predict dropouts in MOOCs
    Kashyap, Avinash
    Nayak, Ashalatha
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING, COMMUNICATIONS AND INFORMATICS (ICACCI), 2018, : 80 - 85
  • [40] Interpretability of simple RNN and GRU deep learning models used to map land susceptibility to gully erosion
    Gholami, Hamid
    Mohammadifar, Aliakbar
    Golzari, Shahram
    Song, Yougui
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 904