Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result

被引:10
|
作者
Beuer, Florian [1 ,3 ]
Sachs, Caroline [1 ]
Groesser, Julian [1 ]
Gueth, Jan-Frederik [1 ]
Stimmelmayr, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Munich Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, Goethestr 70, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Josef Heilingbrunner Str 2, D-93413 Cham, Germany
[3] Charite, Dept Prosthodont, Charite Ctr 03, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Zirconia; Tooth-implant-supported prosthodontics; All-ceramic abutment; Fixed dental prostheses; PARTIAL DENTURES; CERAMIC RESTORATIONS; CONNECTED PROSTHESES; CUSTOMIZED ZIRCONIA; COMPLICATION RATES; OBSERVATION PERIOD; PART II; ABUTMENTS; SURVIVAL; RECONSTRUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-015-1594-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This case series compared the clinical survival of tooth-implant-supported (TI-S) and tooth-supported (T-S) three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia frameworks and described the incidence of biological and technical complications. Forty-four patients received 27 TI-S FDPs and 22 T-S FDPs. Twenty-seven titanium screw implants were inserted at the dislodged position of two missing posterior teeth. All implants were provided with customized zirconia abutments. Zirconia frameworks were fabricated by a CAD/CAM system and veneered in powder build-up technique. All restorations were cemented with glass ionomer. Baseline evaluation was performed 2 weeks after cementation with recall examinations performed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months by calibrated investigators. Survival probabilities according to Kaplan-Meier were calculated. Gingival parameters and bone loss were assessed and statistically evaluated. The mean service time of the FDPs was 35 months (+/- 6). Two technical complications (fracture of veneering porcelain) were observed. One biological complication was recorded. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability was 93.9 % for all types of complications and 100 % related to restorations in service. The type of abutment support (TI-S vs. T-S) had no significant influence on the survival probability (p = 0.412, log rank test). No difference of the gingival parameters was detected between implants and natural teeth. Tooth-implant-supported zirconia-based FDPs showed similar clinical performance compared to tooth-supported zirconia-based FDPs. Within the limitations of this case series, tooth-implant-supported FDPs with zirconia frameworks seem to be a reliable treatment option.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1086
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)
    Florian Beuer
    Daniel Edelhoff
    Wolfgang Gernet
    John A. Sorensen
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2009, 13 : 445 - 451
  • [32] A Four-Year Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia and Metal-Ceramic Posterior Fixed Dental Prostheses
    Pelaez, Jesus
    Cogolludo, Pablo G.
    Serrano, Benjamin
    Lozano, Jose F. L.
    Suarez, Maria J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2012, 25 (05) : 451 - 458
  • [33] Three-year clinical prospective evaluation of zirconia-based posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)
    Beuer, Florian
    Edelhoff, Daniel
    Gernet, Wolfgang
    Sorensen, John A.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2009, 13 (04) : 445 - 451
  • [34] Fracture Resistance of Posterior Tooth-Supported Cantilever Fixed Dental Prostheses of Different Zirconia Generations and Framework Thicknesses: An In Vitro Study
    Klotz, Anna-Luisa
    Halfmann, Janina
    Rues, Stefan
    Boemicke, Wolfgang
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Zenthoefer, Andreas
    Chang, Han-Chao
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    MATERIALS, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [35] Comparison of Fixed Dental Prostheses with Zirconia and Metal Frameworks: Five-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Sailer, Irena
    Balmer, Marc
    Jurg, Husler
    Hammerle, Christoph Hans Franz
    Kanel, Sarah
    Thoma, Daniel Stefan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 30 (05) : 426 - 428
  • [36] Zirconia Posterior Fixed Partial Dentures: A Prospective Clinical 3-year Follow-up
    Schmitt, Johannes
    Holst, Stefan
    Wichmann, Manfred
    Reich, Sven
    Goellner, Matthias
    Hamel, Joerg
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2009, 22 (06) : 597 - 603
  • [37] Clinical Results and Technical Complications of Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 2-Year Pilot Study
    Cheng, Chih-Wen
    Chien, Chia-Hui
    Chen, Chun-Jung
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (02): : 108 - 114
  • [38] Complete-arch implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review
    Abdulmajeed, Aous A.
    Lim, Kevin G.
    Naerhi, Timo O.
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (06): : 672 - 677
  • [39] Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses
    Kondo, Tomohide
    Komine, Futoshi
    Honda, Junichi
    Takata, Hiroki
    Moriya, Yuta
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (02) : 140 - 144
  • [40] Clinical outcomes of full arch fixed implant-supported zirconia prostheses: A systematic review
    Bidra, Avinash
    Rungruanganunt, Patchanee
    Gauthier, Marissa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 : 35 - 45