Tooth-implant-supported posterior fixed dental prostheses with zirconia frameworks: 3-year clinical result

被引:10
|
作者
Beuer, Florian [1 ,3 ]
Sachs, Caroline [1 ]
Groesser, Julian [1 ]
Gueth, Jan-Frederik [1 ]
Stimmelmayr, Michael [2 ]
机构
[1] Munich Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, Goethestr 70, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Josef Heilingbrunner Str 2, D-93413 Cham, Germany
[3] Charite, Dept Prosthodont, Charite Ctr 03, Assmannshauser Str 4-6, D-14197 Berlin, Germany
关键词
Zirconia; Tooth-implant-supported prosthodontics; All-ceramic abutment; Fixed dental prostheses; PARTIAL DENTURES; CERAMIC RESTORATIONS; CONNECTED PROSTHESES; CUSTOMIZED ZIRCONIA; COMPLICATION RATES; OBSERVATION PERIOD; PART II; ABUTMENTS; SURVIVAL; RECONSTRUCTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-015-1594-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This case series compared the clinical survival of tooth-implant-supported (TI-S) and tooth-supported (T-S) three-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia frameworks and described the incidence of biological and technical complications. Forty-four patients received 27 TI-S FDPs and 22 T-S FDPs. Twenty-seven titanium screw implants were inserted at the dislodged position of two missing posterior teeth. All implants were provided with customized zirconia abutments. Zirconia frameworks were fabricated by a CAD/CAM system and veneered in powder build-up technique. All restorations were cemented with glass ionomer. Baseline evaluation was performed 2 weeks after cementation with recall examinations performed at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months by calibrated investigators. Survival probabilities according to Kaplan-Meier were calculated. Gingival parameters and bone loss were assessed and statistically evaluated. The mean service time of the FDPs was 35 months (+/- 6). Two technical complications (fracture of veneering porcelain) were observed. One biological complication was recorded. The Kaplan-Meier survival probability was 93.9 % for all types of complications and 100 % related to restorations in service. The type of abutment support (TI-S vs. T-S) had no significant influence on the survival probability (p = 0.412, log rank test). No difference of the gingival parameters was detected between implants and natural teeth. Tooth-implant-supported zirconia-based FDPs showed similar clinical performance compared to tooth-supported zirconia-based FDPs. Within the limitations of this case series, tooth-implant-supported FDPs with zirconia frameworks seem to be a reliable treatment option.
引用
收藏
页码:1079 / 1086
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Use of Zirconia for Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses: A Narrative Review
    Cinquini, Chiara
    Alfonsi, Fortunato
    Marchio, Vincenzo
    Gallo, Francesco
    Zingari, Francesco
    Bolzoni, Alessandro Remigio
    Romeggio, Stefano
    Barone, Antonio
    DENTISTRY JOURNAL, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [22] Zirconia-veneered polyetherketoneketone frameworks of implant-supported complete arch fixed dental prostheses: A report on 5 patients
    Jung, Bock -Young
    Park, Won -Se
    Woo, Chang -Woo
    Jeong, Sol-Ah
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2023, 130 (04): : 419 - 433
  • [23] Clinical fit of four-unit zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses
    Reich, Sven
    Kappe, Karsten
    Teschner, Hubertus
    Schmitt, Johannes
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2008, 116 (06) : 579 - 584
  • [24] Fracture behavior of all-ceramic, implant-supported, and tooth–implant-supported fixed dental prostheses
    Abdul Rahman Alkharrat
    Marc Schmitter
    Stefan Rues
    Peter Rammelsberg
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 1663 - 1673
  • [25] Clinical performance of long-span zirconia frameworks for fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results
    Schmitter, M.
    Mussotter, K.
    Rammelsberg, P.
    Gabbert, O.
    Ohlmann, B.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2012, 39 (07) : 552 - 557
  • [26] A 3-year follow-up of ceria-stabilized zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (Ce-TZP/A) frameworks for fixed dental prostheses
    Tanaka, Shinpei
    Takaba, Masayuki
    Ishiura, Yuichi
    Kamimura, Emi
    Baba, Kazuyoshi
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 59 (01) : 55 - 61
  • [27] Implant versus tooth-implant supported prostheses in the posterior maxilla:: a 2-year report
    Lindh, T
    Bäck, T
    Nyström, E
    Gunne, F
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2001, 12 (05) : 441 - 449
  • [28] A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions
    Petricevic, Nikola
    Celebic, Asja
    Rener-Sitar, Ksenija
    GERODONTOLOGY, 2012, 29 (02) : E956 - E963
  • [29] A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results
    Naenni, Nadja
    Bindl, Andreas
    Sax, Caroline
    Haemmerle, Christoph
    Sailer, Irena
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2015, 43 (11) : 1365 - 1370
  • [30] Prognosis of implants and abutment teeth under combined tooth-implant-supported and solely implant-supported double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Bernhart, Gunda
    Bermejo, Justo Lorenzo
    Schmitter, Marc
    Schwarz, Stefanie
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (07) : 813 - 818