Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry

被引:65
|
作者
Goodney, Philip P. [1 ]
Nolan, Brian W. [1 ]
Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens [1 ]
Likosky, Donald S. [1 ]
Cronenwett, Jack L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Vasc Surg Sect, Lebanon, NH 03765 USA
关键词
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; JUGULAR-VEIN; EVERSION; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; IMPROVEMENT; SURGERY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Level I evidence shows conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty results in lower rates of restenosis. However, whether this information has affected practice patterns and outcomes in real-world vascular surgery settings is unclear. Methods: Within the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE), we studied 2981 patients undergoing 2981 first-time CEAs between January 1, 2003, and June 31, 2008. Rates of restenosis (defined by duplex ultrasound imaging at the 1-year follow-up) were estimated using life-table analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify multivariable predictors of postoperative restenosis <= 1 year. Results: Across 58 surgeons and 11 hospitals, we studied 2611 conventional CEAs (88% of all CEAs) and 370 eversion CEAs (12% of all CEAs). Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 1-35 months). The proportion of conventional CEAs performed with patching increased from 87% to 96% (P < .001) between 2003 and 2008, whereas eversion CEA declined from 18% to 5% (P < .001). Restenosis occurred in 303 patients (10%); by life-table analysis, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7%-6.8%). Restenoses were most commonly noncritical: 50%-79% restenosis in 7.9%, 80%-99% restenosis in 1.7%, and occlusion in 0.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences in 80% to 100% restenosis by procedure type (2% in conventional CEA, 6% in eversion CEA, P < .002), the year of procedure (3.2% in 2003, 0% in 2008; P < .03), and use of patching in conventional CEA (2.9% no patch, 1% with patch; P < .008). By multivariable analysis, absence of patching (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0), contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis >80% (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-11.5), and dialysis dependence (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8) were independently associated with a higher risk of an 80% to 100% restenosis. Of the 51 patients with 80% to 99% restenosis, 14 underwent reintervention <= 1 year, comprising 4 reoperations and 10 carotid artery stent procedures. Of the 15 patients with a carotid occlusion <= 1 year, transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2 and a disabling stroke in 1. Conclusions: In our region, restenosis after CEA, especially clinically significant restenosis <= 1 year after surgery, decreased slightly over time. This improvement in outcome was associated with several factors, including an increase in patching after conventional CEA, a process of care that was studied and encouraged within our vascular study group. These results highlight the utility of regional quality-improvement efforts in improving outcomes in vascular surgery. (J Vase Surg 2010;52:897-905.)
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] THE INFLUENCE OF SMOKING AND LIPIDS ON RESTENOSIS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    CUMING, R
    WORRELL, P
    WOOLCOCK, NE
    FRANKS, PJ
    GREENHALGH, RM
    POWELL, JT
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 7 (05): : 572 - 576
  • [32] Carotid angioplasty and stent placement for restenosis after endarterectomy
    Yasha Kadkhodayan
    Christopher J. Moran
    Colin P. Derdeyn
    DeWitte T. Cross
    Neuroradiology, 2007, 49 : 357 - 364
  • [33] Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: Incidence and endovascular management
    Oszkinis, G.
    Pukacki, R.
    Juszkat, R.
    Weigele, J. B.
    Gabriel, M.
    Krasinski, Z.
    Zielinski, M.
    Krejza, J.
    INTERVENTIONAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2007, 13 (04): : 345 - 352
  • [34] Carotid angioplasty and stent placement for restenosis after endarterectomy
    Kadkhodayan, Yasha
    Moran, Christopher J.
    Derdeyn, Colin P.
    Cross, DeWitte T., III
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2007, 49 (04) : 357 - 364
  • [35] Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization in the Treatment of Restenosis After Prior Carotid Endarterectomy
    Elsayed, Nadin
    Ramakrishnan, Ganesh
    Naazie, Isaac
    Sheth, Sharvil
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    STROKE, 2021, 52 (10) : 3199 - 3208
  • [36] Favorable outcomes for carotid stenting in patients with restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Jefferson, Brian K.
    Rajagopal, Vivek
    Gurm, Hitinder S.
    Kapadia, Samir R.
    Abou-Chebl, Alex
    Bhatt, Deepak L.
    Chacko, Matthews
    Simpfendorfer, Christian
    Bajzer, Christopher
    Yadav, Jay S.
    CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (18) : 820 - 820
  • [37] Restenosis after Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Timing of Surgery and Incidence of Restenosis
    Kobayashi, Norikata
    Takasaki, Morio
    Ito, Kaname
    Maruyama, Daisuke
    Ishii, Daizo
    Morita, Kenichi
    Satow, Tetsu
    Kataoka, Hiroharu
    Iihara, Koji
    CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASES, 2012, 34 : 19 - 20
  • [38] RESTENOSIS FOLLOWING CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    THOMAS, M
    OTIS, SM
    RUSH, M
    DILLEY, RB
    BERNSTEIN, EF
    CIRCULATION, 1983, 68 (04) : 170 - 170
  • [39] Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: A multicenter study
    New, G
    Roubin, GS
    Iyer, SS
    Vitek, JJ
    Wholey, MH
    Diethrich, EB
    Hopkins, LN
    Hobson, RW
    Leon, MB
    Myla, SV
    Shawl, F
    Ramee, SR
    Yadav, JS
    Rosenfield, K
    Liu, MW
    Gomez, CR
    Al-Mubarak, N
    Gray, WA
    Tan, WA
    Goldstein, JE
    Stack, RS
    JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2000, 7 (05) : 345 - 352
  • [40] Carotid clamping time as a risk factor for early restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Malek, LA
    Malek, AK
    Leszczynski, J
    Toutounchi, S
    Elwertowski, M
    Spiewak, M
    Domagala, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2005, 30 (02) : 143 - 146