Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry

被引:65
|
作者
Goodney, Philip P. [1 ]
Nolan, Brian W. [1 ]
Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens [1 ]
Likosky, Donald S. [1 ]
Cronenwett, Jack L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Vasc Surg Sect, Lebanon, NH 03765 USA
关键词
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; JUGULAR-VEIN; EVERSION; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; IMPROVEMENT; SURGERY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Level I evidence shows conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty results in lower rates of restenosis. However, whether this information has affected practice patterns and outcomes in real-world vascular surgery settings is unclear. Methods: Within the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE), we studied 2981 patients undergoing 2981 first-time CEAs between January 1, 2003, and June 31, 2008. Rates of restenosis (defined by duplex ultrasound imaging at the 1-year follow-up) were estimated using life-table analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify multivariable predictors of postoperative restenosis <= 1 year. Results: Across 58 surgeons and 11 hospitals, we studied 2611 conventional CEAs (88% of all CEAs) and 370 eversion CEAs (12% of all CEAs). Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 1-35 months). The proportion of conventional CEAs performed with patching increased from 87% to 96% (P < .001) between 2003 and 2008, whereas eversion CEA declined from 18% to 5% (P < .001). Restenosis occurred in 303 patients (10%); by life-table analysis, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7%-6.8%). Restenoses were most commonly noncritical: 50%-79% restenosis in 7.9%, 80%-99% restenosis in 1.7%, and occlusion in 0.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences in 80% to 100% restenosis by procedure type (2% in conventional CEA, 6% in eversion CEA, P < .002), the year of procedure (3.2% in 2003, 0% in 2008; P < .03), and use of patching in conventional CEA (2.9% no patch, 1% with patch; P < .008). By multivariable analysis, absence of patching (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0), contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis >80% (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-11.5), and dialysis dependence (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8) were independently associated with a higher risk of an 80% to 100% restenosis. Of the 51 patients with 80% to 99% restenosis, 14 underwent reintervention <= 1 year, comprising 4 reoperations and 10 carotid artery stent procedures. Of the 15 patients with a carotid occlusion <= 1 year, transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2 and a disabling stroke in 1. Conclusions: In our region, restenosis after CEA, especially clinically significant restenosis <= 1 year after surgery, decreased slightly over time. This improvement in outcome was associated with several factors, including an increase in patching after conventional CEA, a process of care that was studied and encouraged within our vascular study group. These results highlight the utility of regional quality-improvement efforts in improving outcomes in vascular surgery. (J Vase Surg 2010;52:897-905.)
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Identification of Predictors of High-Grade Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy in a Multicenter National Database
    Aridi, Hanaai Dakour
    Arora, Manasi
    Locham, Satinderjit
    Nejim, Besma
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Malasi, Mahmoud B.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (06) : E114 - E115
  • [22] Metabolic Syndrome Predicts Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy
    Williams, W. T.
    Assi, R.
    Hall, M. R.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 61 (02) : 568 - 568
  • [23] Metabolic Syndrome Predicts Restenosis after Carotid Endarterectomy
    Williams, Willis T.
    Assi, Roland
    Hall, Michael R.
    Protack, Clinton D.
    Lu, Daniel Y.
    Wong, Daniel J.
    Vasilas, Penny
    Dardik, Alan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 219 (04) : 771 - 777
  • [24] Effect of age and gender on restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Hugl, Beate
    Oldenburg, W. Andrew
    Neuhauser, Beate
    Hakaim, Albert G.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 20 (05) : 602 - 608
  • [25] Local and systemic factors for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Tereshina, O.
    Vachev, A. N.
    Surkova, E. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 : 803 - 803
  • [26] Carotid Restenosis After Endarterectomy and Stenting: A Critical Issue?
    Setacci, Francesco
    Sirignano, Pasqualino
    Galzerano, Giuseppe
    de Donato, Gianmarco
    Cappelli, Alessandro
    Setacci, Carlo
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 27 (07) : 888 - 893
  • [27] Results of carotid stenting in patients with restenosis after endarterectomy
    Rabe, J
    Goedel, H
    Sugita, J
    Roemer, A
    Middeldorf, T
    Schneider, P
    Oetjen, U
    Thomalske, C
    Sievert, H
    STROKE, 2004, 35 (06) : E208 - E208
  • [28] Simultaneous bilateral carotid stenting for restenosis after endarterectomy
    Al-Mubarak, N
    Roubin, GS
    Vitek, JJ
    Gomez, CR
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS, 1998, 45 (01): : 11 - 15
  • [29] Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells and Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy
    Patel, Sanjay D.
    Humphries, Julia
    Mattock, Katherine
    Wadoodi, Ashar
    Modarai, Bijan
    Ahmad, Anwar
    Burnand, Kevin G.
    Waltham, Matthew
    Smith, Alberto
    STROKE, 2012, 43 (06) : 1663 - +
  • [30] Homocysteine as a risk factor of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Bakoyiannis, C.
    Karaolanis, G.
    Moris, D.
    Palla, V.
    Skrapari, I.
    Bastounis, E.
    Georgopoulos, S.
    INTERNATIONAL ANGIOLOGY, 2015, 34 (02) : 166 - 171