Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry

被引:65
|
作者
Goodney, Philip P. [1 ]
Nolan, Brian W. [1 ]
Eldrup-Jorgensen, Jens [1 ]
Likosky, Donald S. [1 ]
Cronenwett, Jack L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Vasc Surg Sect, Lebanon, NH 03765 USA
关键词
PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; PATCH ANGIOPLASTY; PRIMARY CLOSURE; SAPHENOUS-VEIN; JUGULAR-VEIN; EVERSION; POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE; IMPROVEMENT; SURGERY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.005
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Level I evidence shows conventional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with patch angioplasty results in lower rates of restenosis. However, whether this information has affected practice patterns and outcomes in real-world vascular surgery settings is unclear. Methods: Within the Vascular Study Group of New England (VSGNE), we studied 2981 patients undergoing 2981 first-time CEAs between January 1, 2003, and June 31, 2008. Rates of restenosis (defined by duplex ultrasound imaging at the 1-year follow-up) were estimated using life-table analysis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify multivariable predictors of postoperative restenosis <= 1 year. Results: Across 58 surgeons and 11 hospitals, we studied 2611 conventional CEAs (88% of all CEAs) and 370 eversion CEAs (12% of all CEAs). Median follow-up was 12.8 months (range, 1-35 months). The proportion of conventional CEAs performed with patching increased from 87% to 96% (P < .001) between 2003 and 2008, whereas eversion CEA declined from 18% to 5% (P < .001). Restenosis occurred in 303 patients (10%); by life-table analysis, the restenosis rate at 1 year was 6.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.7%-6.8%). Restenoses were most commonly noncritical: 50%-79% restenosis in 7.9%, 80%-99% restenosis in 1.7%, and occlusion in 0.5%. Univariate analyses showed significant differences in 80% to 100% restenosis by procedure type (2% in conventional CEA, 6% in eversion CEA, P < .002), the year of procedure (3.2% in 2003, 0% in 2008; P < .03), and use of patching in conventional CEA (2.9% no patch, 1% with patch; P < .008). By multivariable analysis, absence of patching (hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-7.0), contralateral internal carotid artery stenosis >80% (HR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-11.5), and dialysis dependence (HR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8) were independently associated with a higher risk of an 80% to 100% restenosis. Of the 51 patients with 80% to 99% restenosis, 14 underwent reintervention <= 1 year, comprising 4 reoperations and 10 carotid artery stent procedures. Of the 15 patients with a carotid occlusion <= 1 year, transient ischemic attacks occurred in 2 and a disabling stroke in 1. Conclusions: In our region, restenosis after CEA, especially clinically significant restenosis <= 1 year after surgery, decreased slightly over time. This improvement in outcome was associated with several factors, including an increase in patching after conventional CEA, a process of care that was studied and encouraged within our vascular study group. These results highlight the utility of regional quality-improvement efforts in improving outcomes in vascular surgery. (J Vase Surg 2010;52:897-905.)
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RESTENOSIS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    TERRENCE, CF
    RAO, GR
    VASCULAR SURGERY, 1982, 16 (06): : 388 - 394
  • [2] RESTENOSIS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    BRESLAU, PJ
    STRANDNESS, DE
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIV FUR CHIRURGIE, 1984, 364 : 474 - 475
  • [3] Restenosis after Carotid Endarterectomy
    Kobayashi, Norikata
    Takasaki, Morio
    Ito, Kaname
    Maruyama, Daisuke
    Ishii, Daizo
    Morita, Kenichi
    Satow, Tetsu
    Kataoka, Hiroharu
    Iihara, Koji
    STROKE, 2013, 44 (02)
  • [4] Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Sadideen, H.
    Taylor, P. R.
    Padayachee, T. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2006, 60 (12) : 1625 - 1630
  • [5] Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy
    Burnand, KG
    Hatrick, AG
    Lockhart, SJM
    Dourado, R
    Lattimer, C
    Irvine, AT
    Smith, A
    Humphries, J
    CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1998, 6 (06): : 545 - 551
  • [6] RESTENOSIS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    BUCHE, M
    SCHOEVAERDTS, JC
    JAUMIN, P
    PONLOT, R
    CHALANT, CH
    VASCULAR SURGERY, 1987, 21 (05): : 311 - 315
  • [7] Carotid Stenting for Restenosis after Endarterectomy
    Counsell, Andrew
    Ghosh, Jonathan
    McCollum, Charles C. N.
    Ashleigh, Raymond
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2011, 34 (03) : 488 - 492
  • [8] EARLY RESTENOSIS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    CALLOW, AD
    MATSUMOTO, G
    COSSMAN, D
    STEIN, A
    STROKE, 1977, 8 (01) : 14 - 14
  • [9] EARLY RESTENOSIS AFTER CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY
    COSSMAN, D
    CALLOW, AD
    STEIN, A
    MATSUMOTO, G
    ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1978, 113 (03) : 275 - 278
  • [10] Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy and stenting
    Vidale, Simone
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2013, 12 (02): : 130 - 130