Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

被引:48
|
作者
Troisi, Roberto I. [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Tomassini, Federico [1 ]
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio [2 ]
机构
[1] UZ Ghent, Dept Gen Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantat, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Louvain Univ Hosp, Dept Abdominal Organ Transplantat, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
FOR-SIZE SYNDROME; SPLENIC ARTERY LIGATION; PORTAL FLOW MODULATION; LEFT-LOBE GRAFT; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN; WEIGHT RATIO; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; PORTACAVAL-SHUNT; VENOUS-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed. Results: From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained. Conclusions: GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for malignant metastatic melanoma to the liver
    Ji Zhao
    Multiple Organ Transplant Center
    Hepatobiliary&PancreaticDiseasesInternational, 2010, 9 (03) : 329 - 332
  • [32] Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for acute liver failure in China
    Ding Yuan
    Fei Liu
    Yong-Gang Wei
    Bo Li
    Lv-Nan Yan
    Tian-Fu Wen
    Ji-Chun Zhao
    Yong Zeng
    Ke-Fei Chen
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2012, (48) : 7234 - 7241
  • [33] Feelings of living donors about adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Kusakabe, Tomoko
    Irie, Shinji
    Ito, Naomi
    Kazuma, Keiko
    GASTROENTEROLOGY NURSING, 2008, 31 (04) : 263 - 272
  • [34] Biliary complications following adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Karasu, Z
    Tokat, Y
    Memis, A
    Ersoz, G
    Yuzer, Y
    Killi, R
    Akarca, U
    Gunsar, F
    Batur, Y
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 123 (01) : 86 - 86
  • [35] Hemophagocytic syndrome after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Akamatsu, N.
    Sugawara, Y.
    Tamura, S.
    Matsui, Y.
    Hasegawa, K.
    Imamura, H.
    Kokudo, N.
    Makuuchi, M.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (05) : 1425 - 1428
  • [36] Vascular complications after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Ahn, CS
    Lee, SG
    Lee, YJ
    Park, KM
    Hwang, S
    Kim, KH
    Moon, DB
    Chu, JW
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 9 (06) : C49 - C49
  • [37] Living related adult-to-adult liver transplantation: meeting the donor shortage
    Williams, R
    Alisa, A
    Karani, J
    Rela, M
    Heaton, N
    ANTIVIRAL RESEARCH, 2001, 52 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [38] Biliary complications following adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Karasu, Z
    Tokat, Y
    Memis, A
    Ersoz, G
    Yuzer, Y
    Killi, R
    Akarca, U
    Gunsar, F
    Batur, Y
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2002, 36 : 189 - 189
  • [39] Extended left lobe graft for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation for donor safety and recipient outcome
    Han, E. S.
    Choi, H. J.
    Na, G. H.
    Chun, J. H.
    Park, S. E.
    Hong, T. H.
    You, Y. K.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 30 : 222 - 222
  • [40] Is adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation a viable option for liver replacement?
    Fung, JJ
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 3 (02): : 70 - 71