Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

被引:48
|
作者
Troisi, Roberto I. [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Tomassini, Federico [1 ]
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio [2 ]
机构
[1] UZ Ghent, Dept Gen Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantat, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Louvain Univ Hosp, Dept Abdominal Organ Transplantat, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
FOR-SIZE SYNDROME; SPLENIC ARTERY LIGATION; PORTAL FLOW MODULATION; LEFT-LOBE GRAFT; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN; WEIGHT RATIO; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; PORTACAVAL-SHUNT; VENOUS-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed. Results: From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained. Conclusions: GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Advantage and Feasibility of Extended Left Lobe Graft for Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Choi, H.
    Na, G.
    Chun, J.
    Choi, Y.
    You, Y.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 23 (06) : S869 - S869
  • [22] Risk factors for graft dysfunction after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.
    Marubashi, S
    Dono, K
    Sakon, M
    Takahashi, H
    Hashimoto, K
    Kubota, M
    Yamamoto, S
    Nakano, H
    Nakamori, S
    Umeshita, K
    Monden, M
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (06) : C56 - C56
  • [23] Standardized hybrid living donor hemihepatectomy in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Eguchi, Susumu
    Soyama, Akihiko
    Hara, Takanobu
    Natsuda, Koji
    Okada, Satomi
    Hamada, Takashi
    Kosaka, Taiichiro
    Ono, Shinichiro
    Adachi, Tomohiko
    Hidaka, Masaaki
    Takatsuki, Mitsuhisa
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 24 (03) : 363 - 368
  • [24] Small-for-size graft problems in adult-to-adult living-donor liver transplantation
    Sugawara, Y
    Makuuchi, M
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (03) : S20 - S22
  • [25] SAFETY OF SMALL-FOR-SIZE GRAFT IN ADULT-TO-ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION.
    Moon, Ju Ik
    Shin, Milljae
    Kim, Jong Man
    Chun, Jae Min
    Jung, Gum O.
    Choi, Gyu Seong
    Park, Jae Berm
    Kwon, Choon Hyuck David
    Kim, Sung-Joo
    Joh, Jae-Won
    Lee, Suk-Koo
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 15 (07) : S248 - S248
  • [26] Technical refinement in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using right lobe graft
    Fan, ST
    Lo, CM
    Liu, CL
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 231 (01) : 126 - 131
  • [27] Risk factors for graft dysfunction after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.
    Marubashi, S
    Dono, K
    Takahashi, H
    Gotoh, K
    Hashimoto, K
    Kubota, M
    Miyamoto, A
    Nagano, H
    Nakamori, S
    Umeshita, K
    Sakon, M
    Monden, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 4 : 295 - 295
  • [28] Liver Regeneration After Living Donor Transplantation: Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study
    Olthoff, Kim M.
    Emond, Jean C.
    Shearon, Tempie H.
    Everson, Greg
    Baker, Talia B.
    Fisher, Robert A.
    Freise, Chris E.
    Gillespie, Brenda W.
    Everhart, James E.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 21 (01) : 79 - 88
  • [29] Review article: adult-to-adult right hepatic lobe living donor liver transplantation
    Hayashi, PH
    Trotter, JF
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2002, 16 (11) : 1833 - 1841
  • [30] Safety of donor right hepatectomy for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Itamoto, T
    Emoto, K
    Mitsuta, H
    Fukuda, S
    Ohdan, H
    Tashiro, H
    Asahara, T
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 19 (03) : 177 - 183