Graft inflow modulation in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review

被引:48
|
作者
Troisi, Roberto I. [1 ]
Berardi, Giammauro [1 ]
Tomassini, Federico [1 ]
Sainz-Barriga, Mauricio [2 ]
机构
[1] UZ Ghent, Dept Gen Hepatobiliary & Liver Transplantat, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Louvain Univ Hosp, Dept Abdominal Organ Transplantat, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
FOR-SIZE SYNDROME; SPLENIC ARTERY LIGATION; PORTAL FLOW MODULATION; LEFT-LOBE GRAFT; SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE; MIDDLE HEPATIC VEIN; WEIGHT RATIO; CLINICAL-IMPLICATIONS; PORTACAVAL-SHUNT; VENOUS-PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2016.11.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) has an incidence between 0 and 43% in small-for-size graft (SFSG) adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Portal hypertension following reperfusion and the hyperdynamic splanchnic state are reported as the major triggering factors of SFSS. Intra- and postoperative strategies to prevent or to reduce its onset are still under debate. We analyzed graft inflow modulation (GIM) during adult LDLT considering the indications, efficacy of the available techniques, changes in hemodynamics and outcomes. Materials and methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and the Cochrane Library Central. Treatment outcomes including in-hospital mortality and morbidity, re transplantation rate, 1-, 3-, and 5-year patient overall survival and 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates, hepatic artery and portal vein flows and pressures before and after inflow modulation were analyzed. Results: From 563 articles, 12 studies dated between 2003 and 2014 fulfilled the selection criteria and were therefore included in the study. These comprised a total of 449 adult patients who underwent inflow modulation during adult-to-adult LDLT. Types of GIM described were splenic artery ligation, splenectomy, meso-caval shunt, spleno-renal shunt, portocaval shunt, and splenic artery embolization. Mortality and morbidity ranged between 0 and 33% and 17% and 70%, respectively. Re-transplantation rates ranged between 0% and 25%. GIM was associated with good survival for both graft and recipients, reaching an 84% actuarial rate at 5 years. Through the use of GIM, irrespective of the technique, a statistically significant reduction of PVF and PVP was obtained. Conclusions: GIM is a safe and efficient technique to avoid or limit portal hyperperfusion, especially in cases of SFSG, decreasing overall morbidity and improving outcomes. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 135
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Left lobe adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation: Should portal inflow modulation be added?
    Ishizaki, Yoichi
    Kawasaki, Seiji
    Sugo, Hiroyuki
    Yoshimoto, Jiro
    Fujiwara, Noriko
    Imamura, Hiroshi
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (03) : 305 - 314
  • [2] Liver transplantation of living donor adult-to-adult
    Vilatobá, M
    Eckhoff, DE
    Contreras, JL
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2005, 57 (02): : 252 - 261
  • [3] Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Shah, Shimul A.
    Levy, Gary A.
    Adcock, Lesley D.
    Gallagher, Gary
    Grant, David R.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 20 (05) : 339 - 343
  • [4] IMPACT OF LEFT LOBE GRAFT ON ADULT-TO-ADULT LIVING DONOR LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
    Imura, Satoru
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Arakawa, Yusuke
    Kanamoto, Mami
    Hanaoka, Jun
    Kanemura, Hirofumi
    Morine, Yuji
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Kurita, Nobuhiro
    Utsunomiya, Toru
    Miyake, Hidenori
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 22 : 212 - 212
  • [5] Lower Limit of the Graft in Adult-to-Adult Living-Donor Liver Transplantation
    Akamatsu, N.
    Togashi, J.
    Tamura, S.
    Hasegawa, K.
    Kokudo, N.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (05) : 128 - 128
  • [6] Donor safety in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Zeytunlu, M
    Icoz, G
    Kiliç, M
    Demirbas, T
    Tokat, Y
    Yuzer, Y
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 35 (04) : 1430 - 1432
  • [7] Applicability of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation
    Rimola, A
    Llovet, JM
    Navasa, M
    Bruix, J
    Londoño, MC
    Fuster, J
    García-Valdecasas, JC
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 43 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [8] Donor Risk in Adult-to-Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Impact of Left Lobe Graft
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Kayashima, Hiroto
    Soejima, Yuji
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Ikegami, Toru
    Yamashita, Yoichi
    Harada, Noboru
    Shimada, Mitsuo
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (03) : 445 - 450
  • [9] Adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation using left lobes: The importance of surgical modulations on portal graft inflow
    Lauro, A.
    Uso, T. Diago
    Quintini, C.
    Di Benedetto, F.
    Dazzi, A.
    De Ruvo, N.
    Masetti, M.
    Cautero, N.
    Risaliti, A.
    Zanfi, C.
    Ramacciato, G.
    Begliomini, B.
    Siniscalchi, A.
    Miller, C. M.
    Pinna, A. D.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (06) : 1874 - 1876
  • [10] Modulation of portal graft inflow: A necessity in adult living-donor liver transplantation?
    Troisi, R
    Cammu, G
    Militerno, G
    De Baerdemaeker, L
    Decruyenaere, J
    Hoste, E
    Smeets, P
    Colle, I
    Van Vlierberghe, H
    Petrovic, M
    Voet, D
    Mortier, E
    Hesse, UJ
    de Hemptinne, B
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2003, 237 (03) : 429 - 436