A Multicenter Analysis Examining Patients Undergoing Conversion of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction to Abdominally based Free Tissue Transfer

被引:12
|
作者
Zhao, Ruya [1 ]
Tran, Bao Ngoc N. [2 ]
Doval, Andres F. [2 ]
Broadwater, Gloria [3 ]
Buretta, Kate J. [1 ]
Orr, Jonah P. [1 ]
Lee, Bernard T. [2 ]
Hollenbeck, Scott T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Biostat, Durham, NC USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; abdominal free flap; salvage reconstruction; POSTMASTECTOMY RADIATION-THERAPY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IMMEDIATE; CANCER; MASTECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1641680
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Breast implant placement is the most common method for postmastectomy reconstruction. For patients who develop complications associated with implant-based reconstruction, additional surgeries may be challenging. This study examined implant-based reconstruction failure in patients undergoing salvage with abdominal free tissue transfer. Methods We conducted an Institutional Review Board approved, multicenter retrospective study of patients with implant-based primary breast reconstruction followed by implant removal and subsequent abdominal free tissue transfer between 2006 and 2016. Patient demographics, treatment details, and complications were evaluated. Severity of implant failure was graded as either (1) not severe (delayed salvage reconstruction) or (2) severe (immediate salvage reconstruction). Results Between 2006 and 2016, 115 patients with 180 mastectomy defects underwent primary implant-based reconstruction with subsequent implant removal and abdominally based free tissue reconstruction. Of these, 68 were delayed and 47 were immediate salvage reconstruction. Factors leading to elective removal were capsular contracture, asymmetry, and implant malposition. Factors leading to obligatory removal were infection, delayed wound healing, and implant extrusion. Postmastectomy radiation was significantly associated with immediate salvage reconstruction (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.9) as were large volume implants (p = 0.06). Deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps comprised 78.3% of all abdominally based free tissue reconstructions, while muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps comprised 18.3%. Overall flap failure rate was 2.6% (2.94% delayed and 2.13% immediate salvage reconstruction; p = 1.0). Conclusion Our findings suggest that abdominal free tissue transfer remains a safe and effective salvage modality for implant-based breast reconstruction failure. Patients with severe implant failure were more likely to have received radiation. Surgeons should remain cognizant of this during care of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 691
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mastectomy Incision Choice in Ptotic Patients Undergoing Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction
    Chemakin, Katherine
    Ricci, Joseph A.
    Benacquista, Teresa
    Draper, Lawrence
    Weichman, Katie
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 93 (02) : 163 - 171
  • [32] Cost Analysis of Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Matrix
    de Blacam, Catherine
    Momoh, Adeyiza O.
    Colakoglu, Salih
    Slavin, Sumner A.
    Tobias, Adam M.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 69 (05) : 516 - 520
  • [33] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    Bijkerk, E.
    van Kuijk, S. M. J.
    Beugels, J.
    Cornelissen, A. J. M.
    Heuts, E. M.
    van der Hulst, R. R. W. J.
    Tuinder, S. M. H.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 175 (02) : 369 - 378
  • [34] Breast sensibility after mastectomy and implant-based breast reconstruction
    E. Bijkerk
    S. M. J. van Kuijk
    J. Beugels
    A. J. M. Cornelissen
    E. M. Heuts
    R. R. W. J. van der Hulst
    S. M. H. Tuinder
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2019, 175 : 369 - 378
  • [35] Timing of radiation and outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction
    Kearney, Aaron M.
    Brown, Matthew S.
    Soltanian, Hooman T.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2015, 68 (12): : 1719 - 1726
  • [36] Comparison of the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap with Immediate Fat Transfer versus Abdominally Based Free Tissue Transfer for Breast Reconstruction
    Ma, Ningdan
    Luan, Jie
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (06) : 1060E - 1061E
  • [37] Comparison of the Pedicled Latissimus Dorsi Flap with Immediate Fat Transfer versus Abdominally Based Free Tissue Transfer for Breast Reconstruction
    Black, Cara K.
    Zolper, Elizabeth G.
    Economides, James M.
    Abadeer, Andrew
    Fan, Kenneth L.
    Song, David H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 146 (02) : 137 - 146
  • [38] Local Audit on Implant-based Breast Reconstruction Outcomes
    Yow, Lina
    Haider, Muhammad
    Abou Samra, Walid
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 56 - 57
  • [39] The Partner Perspective on Autologous and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Maxi von Glinski
    Nikla Holler
    Sherko Kümmel
    Christoph Wallner
    Johannes Maximilian Wagner
    Alexander Sogorski
    Felix Reinkemeier
    Mattea Reinisch
    Marcus Lehnhardt
    Björn Behr
    Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2023, 47 : 1324 - 1331
  • [40] Persistent Seroma, a Threat to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction?
    Radu, Mihaela Alexandra
    Blidaru, Alexandru
    CHIRURGIA, 2021, 116 (02) : 201 - 208