A Multicenter Analysis Examining Patients Undergoing Conversion of Implant-based Breast Reconstruction to Abdominally based Free Tissue Transfer

被引:12
|
作者
Zhao, Ruya [1 ]
Tran, Bao Ngoc N. [2 ]
Doval, Andres F. [2 ]
Broadwater, Gloria [3 ]
Buretta, Kate J. [1 ]
Orr, Jonah P. [1 ]
Lee, Bernard T. [2 ]
Hollenbeck, Scott T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[3] Duke Canc Inst, Biostat, Durham, NC USA
关键词
breast reconstruction; abdominal free flap; salvage reconstruction; POSTMASTECTOMY RADIATION-THERAPY; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; IMMEDIATE; CANCER; MASTECTOMY; COMPLICATIONS; IMPACT; RADIOTHERAPY; METAANALYSIS; GUIDELINE;
D O I
10.1055/s-0038-1641680
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Breast implant placement is the most common method for postmastectomy reconstruction. For patients who develop complications associated with implant-based reconstruction, additional surgeries may be challenging. This study examined implant-based reconstruction failure in patients undergoing salvage with abdominal free tissue transfer. Methods We conducted an Institutional Review Board approved, multicenter retrospective study of patients with implant-based primary breast reconstruction followed by implant removal and subsequent abdominal free tissue transfer between 2006 and 2016. Patient demographics, treatment details, and complications were evaluated. Severity of implant failure was graded as either (1) not severe (delayed salvage reconstruction) or (2) severe (immediate salvage reconstruction). Results Between 2006 and 2016, 115 patients with 180 mastectomy defects underwent primary implant-based reconstruction with subsequent implant removal and abdominally based free tissue reconstruction. Of these, 68 were delayed and 47 were immediate salvage reconstruction. Factors leading to elective removal were capsular contracture, asymmetry, and implant malposition. Factors leading to obligatory removal were infection, delayed wound healing, and implant extrusion. Postmastectomy radiation was significantly associated with immediate salvage reconstruction (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.9) as were large volume implants (p = 0.06). Deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps comprised 78.3% of all abdominally based free tissue reconstructions, while muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps comprised 18.3%. Overall flap failure rate was 2.6% (2.94% delayed and 2.13% immediate salvage reconstruction; p = 1.0). Conclusion Our findings suggest that abdominal free tissue transfer remains a safe and effective salvage modality for implant-based breast reconstruction failure. Patients with severe implant failure were more likely to have received radiation. Surgeons should remain cognizant of this during care of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:685 / 691
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Bibliometric analysis of quality of life in implant-based breast reconstruction
    Daneshi, Kian
    Ruccia, Francesca
    Merh, Radhika
    Barlattani, Tommaso
    Alderhalli, Raed
    Clemens, Mark Warren
    Khajuria, Ankur
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [12] An Analysis of the Motivating and Risk Factors for Conversion from Implant-Based to Total Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    Tadiparthi, Sujatha
    Staley, Helen
    Collis, Nicholas
    O'Donoghue, Joe M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [13] Desmoid Tumor and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Kilmartin, Catherine
    Westover, Clinton
    Raghavan, Shyam
    Dillon, Patrick M.
    Campbell, Chris A.
    CASE REPORTS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 16 (01): : 74 - 80
  • [14] Operative risk stratification in the obese female undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction
    Rudolph, Megan
    Moore, Catherine
    Pestana, Ivo A.
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2019, 25 (06): : 1182 - 1186
  • [15] Robotics in Implant-Based and Autologous Breast Reconstruction
    King, Brody W.
    McCarter, Jacob H.
    Burns, Heather R.
    Soleimani, Shirin
    Maricevich, Marco A.
    Yu, Jessie Z.
    SEMINARS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 37 (03) : 168 - 175
  • [16] Recent Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Sadeghi, Payam
    Aryan, Negaar
    Sisti, Andrea
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (05) : 875E - 876E
  • [17] Prophylactic Antibiotics in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Kelley, Katherine
    Viennas, Lambros
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (07) : E212 - E214
  • [18] ARTIFICIAL IMPLANT-BASED BREAST RECONSTRUCTION IN JAPAN
    Minabe, T.
    WOUND REPAIR AND REGENERATION, 2021, 29 (05) : A6 - A6
  • [19] More evidence for implant-based breast reconstruction
    Rocco, Nicola
    Catanuto, Giuseppe
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (02): : 174 - 175
  • [20] Modern Approaches to Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Salibian, Ara A.
    Karp, Nolan S.
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023, 50 (02) : 223 - 234