Measurement error, although ubiquitous, is uncommonly acknowledged and rarely assessed or corrected in epidemiologic studies. This review offers a straightforward guide to common problems caused by measurement error in research studies and a review of several accessible bias-correction methods for epidemiologists and data analysts. Although most correction methods require criterion validation including a gold standard, there are also ways to evaluate the impact of measurement error and potentially correct for it without such data. Technical difficulty ranges from simple algebra to more complex algorithms that require expertise, fine tuning, and computational power. However, at all skill levels, software packages and methods are available and can be used to understand the threat to inferences that arises from imperfect measurements.
机构:
MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2BW, England
Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ctr Nutr Epidemiol Canc Prevent & Survival, MRC, Cambridge, England
Univ London London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Med Stat, London WC1E 7HT, EnglandMRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2BW, England
Keogh, Ruth H.
White, Ian R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
MRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2BW, EnglandMRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2BW, England
White, Ian R.
Rodwell, Sheila A.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Ctr Nutr Epidemiol Canc Prevent & Survival, MRC, Cambridge, EnglandMRC, Biostat Unit, Cambridge CB2 2BW, England