The Measurement Error Elephant in the Room: Challenges and Solutions to Measurement Error in Epidemiology

被引:14
|
作者
Innes, Gabriel K. [2 ]
Bhondoekhan, Fiona [3 ]
Lau, Bryan [3 ]
Gross, Alden L. [3 ]
Ng, Derek K. [3 ]
Abraham, Alison G. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Epidemiol, Anschutz Med Campus,1635 Aurora Ct, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
bias correction; epidemiologic methods; epidemiologic review; measurement error; sensitivity analyses; REGRESSION DILUTION BIAS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; MULTIPLE-IMPUTATION; CANCER-MORTALITY; AIR-POLLUTION; SAMPLE-SIZE; MISCLASSIFICATION; CALIBRATION; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1093/epirev/mxab011
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Measurement error, although ubiquitous, is uncommonly acknowledged and rarely assessed or corrected in epidemiologic studies. This review offers a straightforward guide to common problems caused by measurement error in research studies and a review of several accessible bias-correction methods for epidemiologists and data analysts. Although most correction methods require criterion validation including a gold standard, there are also ways to evaluate the impact of measurement error and potentially correct for it without such data. Technical difficulty ranges from simple algebra to more complex algorithms that require expertise, fine tuning, and computational power. However, at all skill levels, software packages and methods are available and can be used to understand the threat to inferences that arises from imperfect measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 105
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条