PI-RADS 2.0 for Prostate MRI

被引:0
|
作者
Franiel, T. [1 ]
Roethke, M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Jena, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[2] MVZ Conradia GmbH, CONRADIA Radiol & Nukl Med, Alte Holstenstr 16, D-21031 Hamburg, Germany
来源
RADIOLOGE | 2017年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
BIOPSY-NAIVE MEN; CANCER; MANAGEMENT; ANTIGEN; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00117-017-0269-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The PI-RADS 2.0 classification was established by an international collaboration of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), the American College of Radiology (ACR), and AdMetech Foundation to globally standardize the acquisition and interpretation of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The PI-RADS 2.0 aims to improve the detection, localization, staging and risk stratification of patients with suspected or histologically confirmed prostate cancer. Suspicious areas on T2-weighted (T2w) MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were assessed for the presence of a clinically significant prostate cancer with scale from 1 to 5 with 5 being most likely to represent clinically significant prostate cancer. The dominant sequence to detect significant prostate cancer in the peripheral zone is DWI and for the transition zone T2w images. For the local staging of prostate cancer criteria for the assessment of an extracapsular growth were formulated. © 2017, Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 678
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of the PI-RADS 2.1 scoring system to PI-RADS 2.0: Impact on diagnostic accuracy and inter-reader agreement
    Hotker, Andreas M.
    Bluthgen, Christian
    Rupp, Niels J.
    Schneider, Aurelia F.
    Eberli, Daniel
    Donati, Olivio F.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [32] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Steiger, Philipp
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    CANCER IMAGING, 2016, 16
  • [33] Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer
    Tamada, Tsutomu
    Kido, Ayumu
    Takeuchi, Mitsuru
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Miyaji, Yoshiyuki
    Kanomata, Naoki
    Sone, Teruki
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 121
  • [34] Prostate MRI with PI-RADS v2.1: initial detection and active surveillance
    Lo, Grace C.
    Margolis, Daniel J. A.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (07) : 2133 - 2142
  • [35] Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment
    Schelb, Patrick
    Kohl, Simon
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Kickingereder, Philipp
    Bickelhaupt, Sebastian
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    Bonekamp, David
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (03) : 607 - 617
  • [36] IMPLEMENTATION OF PI-RADS IN PROSTATE CANCER WITH 3 TESLA MRI-A PILOT STUDY
    Adarsh, K. M.
    Shahab, Muhammed M. K.
    Pavithra, H.
    Acharya, Devadas
    Ravichandra, G.
    Vinayaka, U. S.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (14): : 1811 - 1814
  • [37] Preoperative MRI PI-RADS scores are associated with prostate cancer upstaging on surgical pathology
    Pockros, Benjamin
    Stensland, Kristian D.
    Parries, Molly
    Frankenberger, Edward
    Canes, David
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    PROSTATE, 2022, 82 (03): : 352 - 358
  • [38] Prostate MRI based on PI-RADS version 2: how we review and report
    Philipp Steiger
    Harriet C. Thoeny
    Cancer Imaging, 16
  • [39] PI-RADS 2.0 for Recurrence Prognosis after radical Prostatectomy
    Heberer, Bettina
    AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 2017, 48 (05) : 414 - 414
  • [40] PI-RADS CATEGORIES ON INITIAL PROSTATE MRI ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE PROGRESSION IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCER
    Wang, Alex Z.
    O'Connor, Luke P.
    Yerram, Nitin
    Zeng, Jonathan
    Mehralivand, Sherif
    Harmon, Stephanie
    Lebastchi, Amir H.
    Ahdoot, Michael
    Telfer, Siobhan
    Gomella, Patrick H.
    Gurram, Sandeep
    Chalfin, Heather
    Nandanan, Naveen
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Merino, Maria J.
    Wood, Bradford J.
    Turkbey, Baris
    Pinto, Peter A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E609 - E609